Help support TMP


"How Journalists Covered the Rise of Mussolini and Hitler" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Interwar (WWI to WWII) Message Board

Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War One
World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Workbench Article

Pete Paints Fantassin's 1/72nd Finnish Support Weapons

When Patrice Vittesse Fezian first saw these figures, he was dreading painting them...


Featured Profile Article

Mystery PBI Photos

Does anyone claim these mystery photos?


Featured Book Review


588 hits since 2 Mar 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0102 Mar 2020 12:35 p.m. PST

"How to cover the rise of a political leader who's left a paper trail of anti-constitutionalism, racism and the encouragement of violence? Does the press take the position that its subject acts outside the norms of society? Or does it take the position that someone who wins a fair election is by definition "normal," because his leadership reflects the will of the people?

These are the questions that confronted the U.S. press after the ascendance of fascist leaders in Italy and Germany in the 1920s and 1930s…."
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian02 Mar 2020 1:38 p.m. PST

Note that this was also difficult because the fascists were organizing to oppose the Communists, who were already practicing violence across Europe at the time. And because the violence was not openly encouraged – in many cases, the politicians disavowed violence (but secretly encouraged it).

deephorse02 Mar 2020 2:28 p.m. PST
Mark 1 Supporting Member of TMP03 Mar 2020 3:01 p.m. PST

But the main way that the press defanged XXX was by portraying him as something of a joke. He was a "nonsensical" screecher of "wild words" whose appearance, according to Newsweek, "suggests Charlie Chaplin." His "countenance is a caricature." He was as "voluble" as he was "insecure," stated Cosmopolitan.

… even after he was made (National Leader) – about a year and a half before seizing dictatorial power – many American press outlets judged that he would either be outplayed by more traditional politicians or that he would have to become more moderate. Sure, he had a following, but his followers were "impressionable voters" duped by "radical doctrines and quack remedies," claimed The Washington Post. Now that XXX actually had to operate within a government the "sober" politicians would "submerge" this movement, according to The New York Times and Christian Science Monitor. A "keen sense of dramatic instinct" was not enough. When it came to time to govern, his lack of … "profundity of thought" would be exposed.

I can think of a couple of countries where, if the population were well educated in history, the electorate might take some sobering concern from these words …

-Mark
(aka: Mk 1)

Tango0104 Mar 2020 12:37 p.m. PST

I can think of more… (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.