Help support TMP


"Sorry, That Cute Robot From the Star Wars Movies" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Media Message Board

Back to the Star Wars Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Bob Olley's Scrunts

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian rediscovers his Scrunts.


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


Featured Book Review


810 hits since 18 Jan 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0118 Jan 2020 1:18 p.m. PST

…. Is Totally Impractical.

"In today's issue of the journal Science Robotics, Robin Murphy of Texas A&M University takes a cold look at some of the technology featured in recent Star Wars films—specifically, the BB-8 astromech droid—and, well, not to spoil everyone's fun, but the ball-shaped bot turns out to be not very realistic. In fact, writes Murphy, when biomechanics expert Dan Goldman of Georgia Tech tried rolling a toy version of BB-8 through sand-like material, it couldn't move at all. The feasibility of this particular droid, and even old-school R2D2, is "questionable," concludes Wright.

Ah well. Actually, NASA already knew that sandy terrain is hazardous for rolling robots, even ones with expensive, custom-built wheels. The Spirit rover eventually died on Mars after getting stuck in a sand pit in 2009, and drivers of Curiosity have to be careful to avoid terrain with slippery sand…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Andrew Walters18 Jan 2020 4:43 p.m. PST

I'm pretty appalled someone wasted that much time arguing that one particular Star Wars droid is "impractical".

Also, since they have cheap and nigh ubiquitous anti-gravity technology, why should a robot every get stuck? It can have some anti-grav as backup. For that matter, if it always has the anti-grav partially on reducing its effective weight, maybe it doesn't get stuck. Etc, etc.

This is not far off from arguing Gandalf could have done X or couldn't have done Y.

Personal logo Dentatus Sponsoring Member of TMP Fezian18 Jan 2020 7:35 p.m. PST

Andrew Walters – I'm constantly surprised to see what gets people worked up. And what doesn't. There are lots of things to get upset about in the world. Star Wars isn't one of them.

I wonder how quickly real world problems could be solved or mitigated if half that effort and energy were directed to address them.

saltflats192918 Jan 2020 8:21 p.m. PST

It was a long time ago.

King Monkey19 Jan 2020 10:26 a.m. PST

In a galaxy far far away

Tango0119 Jan 2020 3:31 p.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse20 Jan 2020 9:12 a.m. PST

Generally most things we see in SF is impractical to say the least.

I mean what idiot would design a 60 ft. tall walking target ? Then compound the idiocy by painting it in bright circus color !?!?!?

huh?

Thresher0120 Jan 2020 2:08 p.m. PST

Yea, that ball and half ball combo seems very, very doubtful, but so too was R2 with those tiny little wheels he must have had "rolling" through sand dunes, and rocky outcroppings as well.

Of course, only later do we find he may have jet-pack jump capability too.

Mithmee21 Jan 2020 1:16 p.m. PST

Well first off they need to get the tech for it right.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.