Help support TMP


"Have humans always gone to war?" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the General Historical Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Basing Winter Trees

Need some trees for your wintery tabletop?


Featured Profile Article

The da Vinci Jr. 1.0 3D Printer: Unboxing & Test Print

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian unpacks and sets up an inexpensive 3D printer, and prints a test object.


548 hits since 3 Jan 2020
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0103 Jan 2020 3:58 p.m. PST

"The question of whether warfare is encoded in our genes, or appeared as a result of civilisation, has long fascinated anyone trying to get to grips with human society. Might a willingness to fight neighbouring groups have provided our ancestors with an evolutionary advantage? With conflicts raging across the globe, these questions have implications for understanding our past, and perhaps our future as well.

The Enlightenment philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau had different visions of prehistory. Hobbes saw humanity's earliest days as dominated by fear and warfare, whereas Rousseau thought that, without the influence of civilisation, humans would be at peace and in harmony with nature…"
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

14Bore03 Jan 2020 5:26 p.m. PST

Yes

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP03 Jan 2020 5:51 p.m. PST

No. War is an extension of politics. Eliminate politics, and all you'll have is blood feuds, lethal territorial disputes and homicide by reason of rage, lust or greed, which seems to be where we started. Those things are not war--just killing.

A pity some humane time traveller didn't drop Rousseau off among New Guinea headhunters to get some perspective on humans without the influence of civilization. A bit rough on Rousseau, perhaps, but would anyone care to estimate the number of people killed already in an effort to perfect mankind along his lines? And I doubt we're half-way done yet. Some bad ideas take a lot of killing. Others cause a lot of killing. Rousseau's, sadly, are both.

Robert le Diable03 Jan 2020 7:14 p.m. PST

Two observations which may be thought relevant; first – and this was published before Goodall's work, since I know what age I was when reading it – the facts that, compared to most animals, humans are relatively puny, and lack the kind of teeth and claws (Howard Hughes apart) that can do much damage, led to the hypothesis that we lack the kind of powerful instinctual inhibition which ensures that most conflicts among animals of the same species do not result in immediate death. Certainly injuries may prove fatal, but in most cases animals, at least, know when to run. Often, the threat is enough, as we've all seen in wildlife documentaries.

The description of Human existence in a "State of Nature" as being "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short" is famous, but the riposte Hobbes is said to have made to adverse criticism of his views may be less so, but equally worthy of being remembered. Asked if they prepared for a journey to London (mid C17th) by, among other things, taking a brace of pistols, his critics replied scornfully that only a fool would take the risk of going unarmed. "I accuse by my words; you by your deeds."

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP03 Jan 2020 7:34 p.m. PST

From my admitly limited knowledge of anthropology I would say that there has been conflict as long as there have been humans – on an individual and tribal level. War is more a product of an organized civilization

Thresher0103 Jan 2020 7:35 p.m. PST

Yes.

War is just killing on a larger scale – more than a few. I suspect it started with one or more of our caveman ancestors within or vs. another tribe, and then just expanded from there over time.

As societies and the number of people in them grew, so did the amount of killing.

In this respect, we are no more evolved than various ants and their colonies, which regularly make war on one another, killing, capturing, and even enslaving their enemies.

Tango0104 Jan 2020 11:56 a.m. PST

so… war is our blood?….


Amicalement
Armand

von Schwartz04 Jan 2020 8:53 p.m. PST

Refer back to an earlier post where I referenced a rather arcane and very dusty old book which was, in essence, an enclyclopeaodia of warfare dating from the ancient Greeks (3,000 to 2,000 BC) to the modern day, 1973 I believe was when the book was published. I had a copy, well over 1,000 pages and small print, used to use it in my regular strength training regimen, just hoist it down from the shelf and back up a few times daily, I had great biceps.
Very few days of true, world wide, peace. So yes, warfare is very human.

Thresher0104 Jan 2020 9:36 p.m. PST

Yep, competition and violence are built into our DNA.

That's why we are the top species on the planet in many/most circumstances, relative to other creatures.

Tango0105 Jan 2020 4:10 p.m. PST

Thanks!.

Amicalement
Armand

mildbill06 Jan 2020 12:06 p.m. PST

war, the second oldest profession.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.