"Why The History Of Medieval Studies Haunts How" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 09 Dec 2019 9:36 p.m. PST |
…We Study The Past. "Medieval Studies has a choice to make. Just this week controversy erupted over the largest annual academic conference devoted to the study of the Middle Ages in all of its forms – the International Congress on Medieval Studies (ICMS), hosted by Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Many academic conferences in the Humanities and Social Sciences work in the following way: prospective attendees submit brief summaries of their presentations, then a selection committee reviews those proposals, and if there are too many for the time available for the conference, picks the "best" ones. The ICMS at Kalamazoo is no different…" Main page link Amicalement Armand |
Puster | 10 Dec 2019 12:32 a.m. PST |
I do not think that I can agree with him. |
robert piepenbrink | 10 Dec 2019 7:24 a.m. PST |
Wrong on so many levels. To pick my favorite, I much prefer people who go around calling everyone they disagree with racists to this whole routine of "I'm not saying you're a racist, BUT…" which has become fashionable on the left. |
Tango01 | 10 Dec 2019 11:34 a.m. PST |
|
Zephyr1 | 10 Dec 2019 10:27 p.m. PST |
I'm thinking hundreds of years ahead when the future historians present summaries of how racist those historians of today are/were… ;-) |
Tango01 | 11 Dec 2019 11:43 a.m. PST |
Glup II! Amicalement Armand |
Erzherzog Johann | 14 Dec 2019 10:30 p.m. PST |
All he's calling for is good vigourous debate around the historiography of the period. I see no problem with that. Cheers, John |
|