Help support TMP


"Medieval Archer units, w/ or w/out banners?" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Basic Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Battle-Market: Tannenberg 1410

The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.


Featured Profile Article

Crusader Jerusalem

Our man in Jerusalem reports on the sights of Crusader-era Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


1,447 hits since 3 Dec 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP03 Dec 2019 10:31 a.m. PST

Just a modeling query, not a historical one.

I've only done the Medieval period in 15mm previously and I always thought banners looked funny in Archer units.

I'm just getting started into 28mm for Hail Caesar and I was wondering what people's preferred practice is banners and Archer units.

Thanks for any tips.

MajorB03 Dec 2019 12:20 p.m. PST

Banners are only carried for a knight banneret or senior.

22ndFoot03 Dec 2019 12:33 p.m. PST

Charles the Bold of Burgundy's ordnance archers carried, or were intended to carry, a flag for each company of archers and one for each squadron of cavalry. How much this was a standardisation of existing practice I don't know but would certainly justify a flag for a Burgundian wargames unit.

I do use flags with units of archers – and most others – usually a "national" flag and the banner of the unit's captain but my units are usually 24 figures and they look nicer with colours.

GurKhan03 Dec 2019 2:51 p.m. PST

At link is a modernised rendering of a 1355 muster of the Norwich militia. The centenars (commanders of 100) have banners, the vintenars (commanders of 20) have pennons ("pyncell"). Some of these men are archers – only a minority, though.

Thresher0103 Dec 2019 4:13 p.m. PST

Well, of course, in the medieval and/or renaissance eras, there are archers (those with bows and arrows as their primary weapons), and then there are "archers", the latter of which seems to me to really be lesser men at arms, on unarmored horses, who carry lances. Of course, perhaps they also carry bows too, hence their name of "archers".

I can see "archer" units carrying banners, if they are more of the men at arms type unit(s).

Swampster03 Dec 2019 4:27 p.m. PST

The mixed, but mostly bow and crossbow armed Brotherhood of St George is shown carrying a banner
link

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP03 Dec 2019 5:42 p.m. PST

In this case I'm strictly referring to missile units Thresher.

Zephyr103 Dec 2019 10:10 p.m. PST

I'd include it just to show it off in my army. ;-)
You can also add a removable banner to a figure's base to give you the option of including one (or not.)

Uesugi Kenshin Supporting Member of TMP04 Dec 2019 9:32 a.m. PST

Thanks all. Banners it is.

22ndFoot04 Dec 2019 10:35 a.m. PST

Gurkhan,

Thanks for the Norwich militia link. That is very interesting indeed. Particularly are the two women who were assessed:

"Leticia King's servant, with staff and dagger.
Petronilla de Bokenham is to find a man with staff and dagger."

Cheers

newarch04 Dec 2019 10:42 a.m. PST

I always supposed that the status of archers/missile equipped troops changed from the early medieval period, where they were broadly there to make up the numbers, to the middle and later period where specialists like longbow and handgunner units were highly respected and regarded as essential for success in battle.

In line with this idea, I assume a levy unit of bowmen or slingers probably wouldn't have any accoutrements besides their weapon, whereas a unit of professional longbowmen would have a uniform/livery, hand weapons and armour, and were likely to have a banner too.

I suspect the term 'unit' is unhelpful in terms of describing some medieval armies though, especially pre-WOTR.

MajorB04 Dec 2019 12:23 p.m. PST

whereas a unit of professional longbowmen would have a uniform/livery,

In the WOTR archers would usually be in a lord's retinue, in which case they would wear his livery. Mercenary troops might have some kind of "uniform", though I am not aware of any mercenary archers in the WOTR.

Swampster04 Dec 2019 4:22 p.m. PST

There are also the crossbow flags such as Siena's from various frescos such as the Val de Chiana (late 14th) and of Fogliano (early 14th).
IIRC, the Libro di Montaperti (1260) shows troops in units other than simply by sesto, but it is a while since I waded through it.

Personal logo Herkybird Supporting Member of TMP06 Dec 2019 5:07 p.m. PST

I always thought archers were commanded by a Knight, who will have had his own banner.

MajorB07 Dec 2019 5:20 a.m. PST

I always thought archers were commanded by a Knight, who will have had his own banner.

There is evidence that in the medieval period groups of 20 men were commanded by a "vintenar" and groups of 100 men by a "centenar" but I am not aware of any evidence that either of these leaders was or had to be a knight.

Also bear in mind that a knight did not have a banner unless he was a knight banneret.

newarch08 Dec 2019 3:44 a.m. PST

My understanding is that vintenars and centenars were drawn from the common born freemen, and provided the requisite number of infantry (not just archers) for their rank, under the employment and patronage of a nobleman.

I'd assume that any banner carried would therefore be the banner of the nobleman.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.