"Was Turkey Protecting ISIS Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi?" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile ArticleWhat if you want to game something too controversial or distasteful to put on the tabletop?
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 20 Nov 2019 12:57 p.m. PST |
"Islamic State (ISIS) caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is dead, killed by an American airstrike in northwest Syria. President Trump announced this morning: "U.S. Special operations forces executed a dangerous and daring night-time raid in northwestern Syria, and accomplished their mission in grand style. The U.S. personnel were incredible." But the question now should not be avoided: why was al-Baghdadi hiding so close to Turkey? Were the Turks protecting him? If not them, then who was?…"
Main page link
Amicalement Armand |
USAFpilot | 20 Nov 2019 4:07 p.m. PST |
Well, if so, Turkey didn't do a very good job in protecting him. |
Patrick R | 21 Nov 2019 3:17 a.m. PST |
Given certain parties' ambitions in the area I wouldn't be surprised if they had a working relationship with each other. |
Tango01 | 21 Nov 2019 12:36 p.m. PST |
|
Thresher01 | 22 Nov 2019 10:32 a.m. PST |
Of course. Erdogan was getting oil from ISIS back in the day – tanker truck loads by the hundreds/thousands, IIRC, and our ridiculously over-tight rules of engagement wouldn't let us target them in many cases. Fortunately, that was changed under new management. |
|