Help support TMP


"Question about Continental Uniforms" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Plastic Figures Message Board

Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Phil Dunn's Sea Battle Games


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Deep Dream: Editor Gwen Goes Air Force

Not just improving a photo, but transforming it using artificial intelligence.


1,302 hits since 18 Nov 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Philotep18 Nov 2019 3:10 p.m. PST

Good evening. This is my first entry in the American Revolution board, i must admit I know very little about this conflict, so I have a (first) question.

I would like to paint some old Airfix 1/72 minis from Washington's army set as privates of the 9th Massachusetts Regiment in 1782, using a very nice Don Troiani's painting as a model.

Here you are the test shot figure:

My question is: do the soldiers of this regiment all wear the same uniform in 1782 (after the 1779 regulation), or are there still many differences between the men – the variations that we could find in a French Napoleonic regiment during the Peninsula war, for instance, or even more variations ?

Thank you in advance for your help.

More pictures and comments here: philotepsfigures.blogspot.com/2019/11/awi-continental-soldier-test-shot.html

Personal logo Herkybird Supporting Member of TMP18 Nov 2019 3:29 p.m. PST

My own take is that most men in the Continental army were 3 year/duration men, and that although the 1779 regulation uniform was the standard, it is quite probable that not all (or even many) men would have been issued with it, and even then it would have deteriorated within a year, so a general mix of colours/types of 'uniform' would be probable.
Some regiments would be more uniformed than others.

I am sure there are lots of folk on TMP will give you more info on this, as my sources are Osprey and Internet searches only.

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP18 Nov 2019 3:46 p.m. PST

Hmm. Without getting into specific regiments in a late-War year--
1. Probably never the degree of uniformity Washington desired. Troops pass in and out, and uniformity would have required a stock of uniforms and other equipment in reserve, which we never seem to have had. So you'd get non-regulation headgear, maybe a hunting jacket instead of a uniform coat sometimes, of coat-tails cut off to patch worn-through elbows--all worse in the Southern Army, of course.
2. But it's not something I'd concern myself with on 1/72 figures--unless you want to for your own amusement. Give or take some fade, we're not talking paint conversions but time spent with knives, pins glue and green stuff, and I wouldn't think it would be worth the effort. Paint them as Washington wanted his regiments to look, and be content.

Nice job on the figure, by the way.

FusilierDan Supporting Member of TMP18 Nov 2019 5:25 p.m. PST

rp +1

That figure brings back some good memories.

Brechtel19819 Nov 2019 4:26 a.m. PST

Some regiments were well-uniformed and some wore a mix of clothing/uniforms depending on the year.

The 1779 uniform regulations were a step forward in improving the Continental Army, just as von Steuben's drill regulations, the famous Blue Book.

However, even if a regiment was well-uniformed in the spring, campaigning and fighting, if the unit was not resupplied regularly, would look ragged by fall.

Regulations were one thing; what the soldiers actually wore was something quite different. And the ubiquitous hunting shirt was always an acceptable option for uniform wear in any unit.

Harold Peterson's The Book of the Continental Soldier as well as The Company of Military Historians Volume I of Military Uniforms in America, edited by John Elting are excellent volumes to have on hand for uniforms.

Well done on the figure.

Jeffers19 Nov 2019 8:33 a.m. PST

Super paint job! Shows Airfix can still hold their own.

I can add very little to the sage advice above apart from paint your toys how you wish. I decided to paint my Continental regiments in uniform coat and facing colours and give the variation through hats and breeches. I might throw in a hunting shirt or two in the next batch.

historygamer19 Nov 2019 9:35 a.m. PST

Looked up the unit in Katcher and did not find much. No mention of colors of issued clothing, and what was there did not reveal entire unit getting clothing issued either (36 coats issued in that year). So the point is, that based on Katcher alone, it might indeed be a regiment of some varied clothing.

Philotep19 Nov 2019 11:16 a.m. PST

Thank you all for your comments and help, highly appreciated.
I usually try to paint units on campaign rather than in full dress, but I don't have enough skill to recreate more accurate soldiers with tons of green stuff (I wish I could). Nevertheless, I will try some headswaps, maybe hatswaps, and find others sets from which I can mix minis. So they won't be fully uniformed, even if they won't pretend to be on a 3 months campaign :)

Yngtitan21 Nov 2019 7:14 a.m. PST

Outstanding panitjob 0n an old classic.

historygamer21 Nov 2019 10:17 a.m. PST

It does look good. :-)

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.