Help support TMP


"Radio Commander Wargame Op Ed" Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Fear & Faith


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Minifigs' T-80B and BMP-1

PeteMurray takes a look at Microfigs' Soviet T-80B tank and a BMP-1 infantry fighting vehicle in N scale.


Featured Workbench Article

ZorzSERBIA Paints Hasslefree's Ken & Kendra

Two of Hasslefree's Adventurers venture to Serbia...


Featured Profile Article

Dung Gate

For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


397 hits since 23 Oct 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Colonel Bill23 Oct 2019 3:06 p.m. PST

FYI and FWIW.

This week's tome is especially for all you veterans and currently serving military folks out there. A very unique game where the player relies ONLY AND SOLEY on radio communications to play the game. This is not a review but my own op-ed commentary. Have no idea if a mini option is even possible, but wonder what you might think overall.

link

Colonel Bill

brass124 Oct 2019 10:16 a.m. PST

@Colonel Bill,

Interesting commentary but, as you said, you weren't in Viet Nam. I was, twice.

Re: call-signs. My call-sign, when I had one, was Waxwing Bonito Three Seven Zulu. This was not generated by SOI, which I doubt was in use in Southeast Asia, but on the fly by company HQ. It certainly wasn't changed every 24 hours, or 24 weeks for that matter.

Re: SOI authentication. No SOI, so no authentication.

Re: radio chatter. If the 1st Armored Division deployed, not as a division, but as a group of independent battalions with little contact with each other there might be more extraneous chatter. It gets lonely out in the boonies and some radio traffic was of the "I'm still alive, how about you?" type. Big deal. As for reporting the coordinates of the enemy when the unit comes under fire, you sort of need to know where the enemy are, which is not necessarily available intel when you're fighting guerrillas in horrible terrain. Remember, this was pre-GPS and pre-satellite recon, so what you had was a map and a compass.

Re: moving TOC every day. Armored divisions can move their TOC every day but Viet Nam was mostly a foot-soldier's war, supplied from the air, and once a battalion hit the ground, the BTOC was set up, the line companies began operations, and the BTOC stayed put until the operation was over.

I admit a: some of this is very subjective, b: I was an NCO, not an officer, and as such had no access to the secret knowledge, and c: I was in II Corps during my first tour and I Corps during my second tour, so I have no knowledge of SOP in the Delta or in I Corps north of Phu Bai.

LT

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.