"Aerial Arsenal at Leyte Gulf" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two at Sea
Featured Link
Featured Showcase ArticleCan a WWII blockgame find happiness as a miniatures campaign system?
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Editor in Chief Bill | 23 Oct 2019 11:36 a.m. PST |
High-performance aircraft were key when the U.S. Third and Seventh fleets faced off against Japanese surface forces, land-based planes, and carrier aircraft in October 1944… link |
Shagnasty | 23 Oct 2019 12:02 p.m. PST |
All true but I love the Dauntless! |
ScottWashburn | 23 Oct 2019 12:10 p.m. PST |
Pilot training and experience was just as important as the aircraft--perhaps more so. By this stage of the war, even green US pilots had hundreds of hours of flight time while many Japanese pilots barely knew how to fly, let alone fly in combat. |
Yellow Admiral | 23 Oct 2019 1:46 p.m. PST |
That article describes the contents of my crafting desk right now. - Ix |
Editor in Chief Bill | 23 Oct 2019 5:18 p.m. PST |
I doubt that high performance aircraft were the key to that battle, actually. |
Ed Mohrmann | 25 Oct 2019 6:21 a.m. PST |
A weapon is only as effective as the warrior who wields it – and a warrior with an inferior weapon is a casualty-in-waiting. The USN had, by mid-1944 very well trained and in many cases very experienced and very well-led pilots and aircrews. Couple those with the F4U, the F6F, the SB2C and the TBF/M – which compared with their IJN counterparts were 'high performance' indeed – and it is fair to say that the pair (warrior and weapon) were key to the outcome – numbers too, of course. |
|