Help support TMP


"Effectiveness of an RPH with HE warhead." Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Gridiron Heroes


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article

Whence the Deep Ones?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian speculates about post-Innsmouth gaming.


Current Poll


760 hits since 27 Sep 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

UshCha27 Sep 2019 9:05 a.m. PST

If I look at the BMP platoon and the like, it has a Machine Gun and an RPG team. It got me thinking at what targets and for what reasons would an RPG WITH HE be better than say a Machyine gum. Clearly armored targets are an RPG only issue, but that would be HEAT. I was thinking of the Basic HE round available for many RPG's.

Garand27 Sep 2019 9:37 a.m. PST

I would think doing things like taking out bunkers, fortified positions, etc. Same sort of stuff you would want a grenade launcher for.

Damon.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse27 Sep 2019 2:24 p.m. PST

HE for non-armored targets, e.g. Infantry, trucks, etc. However, AFAIK, the RPG is generally AT.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP27 Sep 2019 2:35 p.m. PST

Well, an MG is a suppression weapon. So to my mind completely different purposes for each. An HE round makes a small area go boom. So great for bunkers, buildings, soft vehicles.

shaun from s and s models28 Sep 2019 2:09 a.m. PST

the russians developed a thermo baric round for use in afghanistan as they felt the he round was not very good for caves and bunkers.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse28 Sep 2019 7:36 a.m. PST

Yes, MGs are for suppressive fires, FPLs, etc. And are very effective against Infantry and light vehicles, including light AFVs, in some cases. E.g. a .50 cal will take out a BMP from the flank or rear.

As well as, as I said HE is effective vs. Infantry, light vehicles, etc. … HE rounds generally have a blast/burst radius of some type even if very small. E.g. 60mm mortar vs. 81mm mortar, etc.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.