Help support TMP


"Artillery employment and tactics" Topic


53 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Workbench Article

From Fish Tank to Tabletop

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian receives a gift from his wife…


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


3,763 hits since 9 Sep 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pages: 1 2 

von Winterfeldt12 Oct 2019 8:47 a.m. PST

yes – it is what I call military philosophy, a lot things were done differently in reality.

Analsim12 Oct 2019 10:18 a.m. PST

Guibert is commenting on 18th century French Army Doctrine.

Doctrine itself, provides a common frame of reference across the entire spectrum.

Military doctrine is the expression of how military forces (i.e. Inf, Cav, Arty & etc.) contribute to campaigns, major operations, battles, and engagements.

Overall, military doctrine is intended as a guide to action, rather than hard and fast rules.

The Army's Organization also plays a key role in shaping actual use too. Example: Cannons provided at the Battalion, Brigade/Division and Corps (i.e. Reserve) levels have specific purposes and intent. Which affects how they are used and deployed,…especially in respects to counter-battery fire.

SHaT198412 Oct 2019 4:05 p.m. PST

Hence the Maxim's de Napoleon…
keepin' on track ===

Pages: 1 2 

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.