Help support TMP


"The Last Salute of the Army of Northern Virginia" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Soldiers

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian prepares to do some regimental-level ACW gaming.


Featured Profile Article

Other Games at Council of Five Nations 2011

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian snapped some photos of games he didn't get a chance to play in at Council of Five Nations.


656 hits since 15 Aug 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0115 Aug 2019 9:50 p.m. PST

"It is an astounding fact that among the thousands of official documents bearing upon the Civil war in the National Archives at Washington there is absolutely nothing dealing with one of the most dramatic features of the great four years' internal struggle--the actual ceremonies attendant upon the formal surrender by General Lee's army of all Confederate property in their possession at Appomattox Courthouse thirty-six years ago.

When General Lee surrendered to General Grant, April 9th, 1865, the war was virtually over, but of the details of the surrender, the pathetic sadness on the one side, the jubilant satisfaction on the other, and, more particularly of the precise arrangements, the mode of procedure and the Northern army officer whose duty it became to take charge of the rebel arms and the rebel battleflags as they were given up--of all this our official war records tell not a word…"
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

ScottWashburn Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Aug 2019 9:54 a.m. PST

Chamberlain's account of the surrender has puzzled Civil War reenactors for years. "Carry Arms" is a position used in Winfield Scott's tactics manual and has the soldier carrying the rifle on his left shoulder with the butt in his left hand, arm fully extended down at his side. But by 1865 very few Union soldiers would have ever used Scott's. The manual used by most was Casey's and Casey did not use Carry Arms. Instead the command was "Shoulder Arms" which has the rifle in the right hand as described in the linked article above. So Chamberlain's description is puzzling. My personal theory is that he wrote this description well after the event and later in the 19th Century the drill manuals had changed so that what had once been called Shoulder Arms was now called Carry Arms. Perhaps Chamberlain just wanted to use the current term for the position. Or maybe he was just confused :)

Tango0116 Aug 2019 11:19 a.m. PST

Thanks!.


Amicalement
Armand

pzivh43 Supporting Member of TMP16 Aug 2019 2:19 p.m. PST

Reading of General Chamberlain's salute to the surrendering Rebels has never failed to bring tears to my eyes. A gallant gesture by a great man who recognized the bravery and determination of the men he fought against, his once and future countrymen. Men like him are the reason the war did not degenerate into a bitter guerilla war.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.