"Dubno 1941. The Greatest Tank Battle of WW2" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Media Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land World War Two at Sea World War Two in the Air
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 03 Jul 2019 12:54 p.m. PST |
"In June 1941 – during the first week of the Nazi invasion in the Soviet Union – the quiet cornfields and towns of Western Ukraine were awakened by the clanking of steel and thunder of explosions; this was the greatest tank battle of the Second World War. About 3,000 tanks from the Red Army Kiev Special Military District clashed with about 800 German tanks of Heeresgruppe South. Why did the numerically superior Soviets fail? Hundreds of heavy KV-1 and KV-2 tanks, the five-turret giant T-35 and famous T-34 failed to stop the Germans. Based on recently available archival sources, A. Isaev describes the battle from a new point of view: that in fact it's not the tanks, but armoured units, which win or lose battles. The Germans during the Blitzkrieg era had superior tactics and organisations for their tank forces. The German Panzer Division could defeat their opponents not by using tanks, but by using artillery, which included heavy artillery, and motorized infantry and engineers. The Red Army's armoured units – the Mechanized Corps – had a lot of teething troubles, as all of them lacked accompanying infantry and artillery. In 1941 the Soviet Armoured Forces had to learn the difficult science – and mostly ‘art' – of combined warfare. Isaev traces the role of these factors in a huge battle around the small Ukrainian town of Dubno. Popular myths about impregnable KV and T-34 tanks are laid to rest. In reality, the Germans in 1941 had the necessary tools to combat them. The author also defines the real achievements on the Soviet side: the blitzkrieg in the Ukraine had been slowed down. For the Soviet Union, the military situation in June 1941 was much worse than it was for France and Britain during the Western Campaign in 1940. The Red Army wasn't ready to fight as a whole and the border district's armies lacked infantry units, as they were just arriving from the internal regions of the USSR. In this case, the Red Army tanks became the ‘Iron Shield' of the Soviet Union; they even operated as fire brigades. In many cases, the German infantry – not tanks – became the main enemy of Soviet armoured units in the Dubno battle. Poorly organized, but fierce, tank-based counter-attacks slowed down the German infantry – and while the Soviet tanks lost the battle, they won the war."
Main page
link Amicalement Armand |
Joe1870 | 03 Jul 2019 3:35 p.m. PST |
Really good book. I enjoyed it. |
skipper John | 03 Jul 2019 4:23 p.m. PST |
Only 4.99 for my kindle! Woohoo! Thanks Armand. You too Joe! |
Cuprum2 | 03 Jul 2019 7:48 p.m. PST |
Isaev is one of the best modern Russian historians on the topic of the Second World War. It is objective, free from propaganda cliches (both pro-Soviet and anti-Soviet). He makes extensive use of German and Soviet documents in his work (he was an employee of the Institute of Military History of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation). His first education is a systems analysis engineer, which is perfectly reflected in his analysis of information. I highly recommend reading his books. You definitely will not be disappointed. |
Tango01 | 04 Jul 2019 11:57 a.m. PST |
A votre service mon ami! (smile) Amicalement Armand
|
|