Help support TMP


"Nizim i jedid " Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Soldaten Hulmutt Jucken

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints the Dogman from the Flintloque starter set.


Featured Workbench Article

From Fish Tank to Tabletop

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian receives a gift from his wife…


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


968 hits since 5 Jun 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

teper196105 Jun 2019 8:20 a.m. PST

I've read that this part of the Ottoman (turkish) army of the Napoleonic wars were raised and trained in the Western style, by a variety of officers from various different nations. What i can't find is any reference to them being able to form a square in the event they are threatened by cavalry.
It seems the tactics used by the Ottoman were (at this time) still the 'linear tactics' from the early 1700's.
Thoughts anyone?

Personal logo The Badger Sponsoring Member of TMP05 Jun 2019 9:37 a.m. PST

I cannot remember where, but I believe I read they also used something similar to an Austrian Battalionmasse.

Robert Burke05 Jun 2019 10:42 a.m. PST

The Nizam were the only Ottoman infantry that had bayonets. Since they were trained in the European style, I think its logical to assume that they could form square.

From what I've ready, the Janissaries formed a triple column that was two ranks deep. On the table, it would look like a double line. I don't know if they could rebel cavalry like the Austrian battalionmasse, which was much deeper.

They also did not use volley fire. Each man fired at will, similar to skirmishers.

stecal Supporting Member of TMP06 Jun 2019 7:11 a.m. PST

Ottoman infantry typically entrenched on defense. On the offense they usually had an overwhelming superiority in cavalry that would keep enemy cavalry occupied.

huevans01113 Jun 2019 3:33 p.m. PST

Just reading Piers Mackesy's "British Victory in Europe 1801". The Turks were a medieval levy that could barely advance a few hundred yards in line formation and had no modern drill or discipline.

Form square????!!!! In your dreams!

Stoppage14 Jun 2019 2:20 a.m. PST

@Huevans011:

Wiki help you friend: link

With brits versus franche in palestine – good good

Prince of Essling24 Jun 2019 5:53 a.m. PST

Excellent article "THE NIZAM-I CEDID ARMY UNDER SULTAN SELIM III 1789-1807" by Stanford J. Shaw Cambridge (Mass.) at
PDF link

Reading between the lines it is quite possible that the NIZAM-I CEDID were trained to form square… Clearly they were much better than the traditional Ottoman troops.

Stoppage24 Jun 2019 12:44 p.m. PST

Clearly they were much better than the traditional Ottoman troops…

…at Western-European-Style close-order battle.

However, this requires expensive training and equipment and logistics support.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.