"About Mercenaries." Topic
1 Post
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench Articlewodger begins his series on how to paint a 15mm DBA army well, in a reasonable time frame.
Featured Profile ArticleOur man in Jerusalem reports on the sights of Crusader-era Jerusalem.
|
Tango01 | 28 May 2019 3:24 p.m. PST |
"Unlike the case of privateering, there is no consensus on how a mercenary should be defined. 54 We generally think of a mercenary as one who fights for an employer other than his home state and whose motivation is economic. The soldier of fortune is the ideal type of a mercenary. However, there are mixed forms of military service that meet one but not both of the aforementioned criteria. For example, British officers who are "seconded" to Middle East armed forces serve a foreign army but do so at the behest of their home state. And the volunteers of the International Brigades in the Spanish Civil War fought for a foreign military force and were paid but, it is generally agreed, were motivated by political ideals rather than monetary gain. On the other hand, members of an all-volunteer citizen army are paid to fight but hardly warrant the label of mercenaries. Here it is interesting to note that "etymologically . . . `soldier' carries the meaning `he who fights for pay.'" Mockler may be correct in saying that "the real mark of the mercenary [is] a devotion to war for its own sake," but since individual motivations are impossible to determine, this is not helpful for analysis. For purposes of this study, I will use the term mercenarism to refer to the practices of enlisting in and recruiting for a foreign army…." Main page link Amicalement Armand |
|