Help support TMP


"Napoleon's finest battle was..." Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Fire and Steel


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Workbench Article

Modeling 1:1200 Scale Napoleonic Sailing Ships

Volunteer Fezian shares his techniques for painting, rigging and basing Age of Sail warships.


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


1,098 hits since 22 May 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian22 May 2019 1:36 p.m. PST

You were asked – TMP link

Which battle best demonstrates Napoleon's generalship?

In the final round of voting:

72% said "Austerlitz"
5% (tie) said "Marengo" OR "Jena"
3% said "Ulm"

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP22 May 2019 2:08 p.m. PST

The rabbits

OK, maybe Marie Waleska. As locals would put it "By, she were fit". Story goes she were a good looking lass and quite taken with our Boney. Some campaigns are worth it

Whirlwind23 May 2019 2:28 a.m. PST

I disagree with this one! A large part of the success at Austerlitz has to be attributed to Allied mishandling rather than Napoleonic brilliance…I'd pick something from 1813-14 I think. Dresden maybe, or something from the Six Days' Campaign. Even Ligny is perhaps underrated because of what came after. One of the ones that you read about and think Napoleon had no right to win that.

rustymusket23 May 2019 4:43 a.m. PST

He might have shined best in his ability to pull things together in 1809 after Berthier had dealt as best he could with Napoleon's remote directions. Prior to Aspern-Esseling.

Nine pound round23 May 2019 5:05 a.m. PST

First Italian campaign; not just rabbit after rabbit out of a hat, but that amazing ability to recover from the missteps, blind-alley semi-successes, and unexpected contingencies that dog every general. Again and again and again. With an ill-supplied army facing enemies converging from every point of the compass. It's the foundation of the Napoleonic legend, and justly so.

Put another way- I never realized how hard the things he pulled off were until I tried to play his role in a Rivoli scenario….

ConnaughtRanger23 May 2019 12:36 p.m. PST

Waterloo, apparently – according to many people on this Forum?

Brechtel19824 May 2019 5:27 a.m. PST

Who?

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP24 May 2019 1:37 p.m. PST

The approach to "Waterloo" sure, every time.

Even then, one might argue up until they crossed the border, genius. The planned invasion was superb. Then the execution by his subordinates…poor/incompetent/indolent/treasonous ….

But he was the C in C. Other than in ones memoires, that is it. Down to you alas if it all goes wrong

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.