Balthazar Marduk | 17 May 2019 1:16 p.m. PST |
Hey guys, over at my blog I did a quick size comparison with some really blurry and poorly planned photos that show off the size difference between Khurasan's T-90 and the TY T-72. Brass tacks: Khrusan made a great looking model, but the T-72 is very tall next to it. link |
22ndFoot | 17 May 2019 1:48 p.m. PST |
Balthazar, If the T-72 is 7'4" or 2.23m tall and the T-90 is 7'3" or 2.22m in 1/100th each model should be 22mm in height. Which model is closest to that? If one is way off, I'd probably look for another source, but that's just me. YMMV |
15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 17 May 2019 2:30 p.m. PST |
The difference in height is too noticeable between the two. The gun of the T-72 is also way longer. That's too bad as it would be a deal-breaker for me. Thanks for the post. |
Tony S | 17 May 2019 2:56 p.m. PST |
I'm going from memory, so I could be wrong, but I seem to recall some of Battlefront's WW2 tanks were also too tall. Mind you, that was back in the day when the tanks were resin. I also had trouble unseeing some of my Panthers towering over Panthers from other manufacturers. |
cliff0916 | 17 May 2019 3:01 p.m. PST |
Battlefront is known for making things larger than normal in size. A prime example is the milan launchers they include in the vehicle kits. Which miniature is closer to being most accurate? |
15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 17 May 2019 3:02 p.m. PST |
It could be that unscrupulous companies like BF intentionally make their miniatures incompatible with their competitors' as a ploy to discourage us from buying cheaper alternatives in the same scale. |
Balthazar Marduk | 17 May 2019 3:40 p.m. PST |
22ndFoot, I'll break out a ruler later and get back to you on it. I really can't stress enough how nice that T-90 is, though. |
leidang | 17 May 2019 4:41 p.m. PST |
|
Mr Jones | 17 May 2019 5:24 p.m. PST |
Battlefront will be the one that is out, no doubt. |
Balthazar Marduk | 17 May 2019 6:29 p.m. PST |
The T-72 is around 25mm tall and the T-90 is a hair over 20mm. |
Walking Sailor | 17 May 2019 6:33 p.m. PST |
While you've got your ruler handy; I see link that you also have T-55AM2's for both Battle Front and the Plastic Soldier Company? I have heard that BF runs tall to not have their Infantry tower over their tanks. This suggests that Khurasan would benefit from a 2-3 mm base |
Balthazar Marduk | 17 May 2019 6:34 p.m. PST |
I also have a Khurasan T-64B and a box of Team Yankee T-64s. I might get another comparison up tonight or tomorrow because Inremember a thread up here where someone asked what the size difference of those two specifically were. |
Balthazar Marduk | 17 May 2019 6:40 p.m. PST |
You know what, Walking Sailor, I'll make a blog post showing it all along with a comparison of Battlefront's US infantrymen and Khurasans evil mid-tech infantry. May as well do it all at the same time. |
Balthazar Marduk | 17 May 2019 8:12 p.m. PST |
Team Yankee resin T-55AM2 is about 33mm, plastic TY T-55AM2 is 32mm and the Plastic Toy Compant T-55AM2 is 31mm tall. Something of note here, the PSC model is 68mm long and both Team Yankee models are 63mm in length. |
repaint | 18 May 2019 2:16 p.m. PST |
on the real steel, hull length is 6.2 m, or 62mm at 1/100 scale. |