"The Hundred Years War and Historians" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Media Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleThe Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile ArticleThe Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 25 Apr 2019 12:39 p.m. PST |
"The ‘Hundred Years War' is, strictly speaking, an invention of historians. The phrase ‘Guerre de Cent Ans' first occurs in print in France in 1861, and was soon taken up with enthusiasm in England.1 Thenceforward the term has enjoyed universal acceptance in popular and academic circles alike. By the time it was coined much ink had already been expended on the Anglo-French conflicts of the later middle ages. Even within the period itself, the wars formed the predominant subject of many narratives, and these in turn provided the principal materials for historians of subsequent centuries. Thus there is much to read, even if some of it, both medieval and later, is blatantly derivative or prejudiced. In this study we can outline only the main themes of the subject's historiography. As we shall see, many influences played on those who wrote about the wars in the past: the sources at their disposal; their patriotic or political sympathies; their purpose in writing; their expected audience; and the view of ‘history' which obtained at the time of writing." Main page link Amicalement Armand |
KSmyth | 26 Apr 2019 4:54 p.m. PST |
Thi,s was written 26 years ago. I'm not sure what it's value is when so much has been written about the conflict in the years since 1993. And nobody has profited more from the research and revision of this time than Anne Curry. The abstract tells us little, and I certainly can't access the article. What's the point? |
|