Help support TMP


"The Hundred Years War and Historians" Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Battle-Market: Tannenberg 1410

The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.


Featured Workbench Article

From Fish Tank to Tabletop

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian receives a gift from his wife…


Featured Profile Article

GameCon '98

The Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).


540 hits since 25 Apr 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0125 Apr 2019 12:39 p.m. PST

"The ‘Hundred Years War' is, strictly speaking, an invention of historians. The phrase ‘Guerre de Cent Ans' first occurs in print in France in 1861, and was soon taken up with enthusiasm in England.1 Thenceforward the term has enjoyed universal acceptance in popular and academic circles alike. By the time it was coined much ink had already been expended on the Anglo-French conflicts of the later middle ages. Even within the period itself, the wars formed the predominant subject of many narratives, and these in turn provided the principal materials for historians of subsequent centuries. Thus there is much to read, even if some of it, both medieval and later, is blatantly derivative or prejudiced. In this study we can outline only the main themes of the subject's historiography. As we shall see, many influences played on those who wrote about the wars in the past: the sources at their disposal; their patriotic or political sympathies; their purpose in writing; their expected audience; and the view of ‘history' which obtained at the time of writing."
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

KSmyth26 Apr 2019 4:54 p.m. PST

Thi,s was written 26 years ago. I'm not sure what it's value is when so much has been written about the conflict in the years since 1993. And nobody has profited more from the research and revision of this time than Anne Curry. The abstract tells us little, and I certainly can't access the article. What's the point?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.