Help support TMP


"54mm Wurttemberg Jaegers" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Gallery Message Board

Back to the Plastic Army Men Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic
Toy Gaming

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

March Attack


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Profile Article

Rubbery Dinos at the Dollar Store

Get these inexpensive dinos while you can.


Featured Book Review


1,419 hits since 19 Apr 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP19 Apr 2019 9:26 a.m. PST

A few jaegers from the Hat box that I am working on. Not exactly sure what I am going to do with them. I have some Russians to paint as well.

flickr.com/photos/79thpa

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP19 Apr 2019 12:44 p.m. PST

I just could not resist the B25s. Why do US bombers of WWII just look so…I hate the use of this word these days…..it was our word…..but it is ….cool?


Yes, your Jaegers are equally low temperature, but you cannot beat a Mitchell B25

Marc the plastics fan21 Apr 2019 11:59 a.m. PST

As Matt Smith might have said "54s are cool"

And the B25 was nice, but for a kid it had to be the Lanc or the B17. Fantastic box artwork

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP21 Apr 2019 12:16 p.m. PST

B17G did take some beating I admit. It almost created the word "Iconic".


Lancasters were a bit…the same….black, green, dark earth…..OK drop the dorsal turret, add a ventral turret, or drop something weighing 22,000 lbs…blimey 22,000 lbs…

But if you post a link to summat that is far better than you intended to show…..your fault!

Garde de Paris03 May 2019 1:01 p.m. PST

I was 4 when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. My dad ran the projector at one of our 3 movie houses, so I spent Saturday matinee hours enjoying the cool tanks and planes.
I saw the 16 Mitchells leave the US Carrier for the bombing run on Japan, mere months after Pearl Harbor.

The Mitchell with the 8 .50 caliber M2's in the nose must have been one that skip-bombed Japanese shipping. They also has a modification carrying a 75mm pack Howitzer in the nose!

I did not know it at the time, but the British bombers did not carry a co-pilot, nor did they have a lower ball turret. Most of the night-bombing losses were to German twin motor planes that were sitting ducks by day. Not unlike our Grant and Lee tanks that were somewhat effective against Rommel, then obsolete, then became the Allied "Tiger Tanks" against the Japanese!

GdeP

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.