Help support TMP


"scale in Alter of Freedom" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Age of Iron


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Building Little Round Top

The goal is to build a series of gameboards covering Longstreet's Assault on the 2nd day of Gettysburg.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


1,123 hits since 10 Apr 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Oathman10 Apr 2019 3:09 a.m. PST

Hi all

I have 2 armies for the ACW based for Volley & Bayonet. I have changed the basing to cm instead of inches so a brigade of infantry are based on a 3x3cm base. Alter of freedom have a brigade base of 6x3cm. Do you think that I should change the scale of Alter of freedom or can I use the ranges in the rules as writen? Any idéas regarding this?

I don't want to put two of my brigades together to form one brigade I AoF since that would split my armies to half as many units.

Regards/
Conny

Thomas O10 Apr 2019 6:29 a.m. PST

I play AoF and don't see a problem, especially since you have both armies. I would just leave the scale of the game as it is and play that way. You could if space was limited shrink the scale, but really I don't see a need.

Oathman10 Apr 2019 8:23 a.m. PST

Thank you for your reply Thomas. I was thinking that way my self but needed someone to kick me in the right direction, thanks for the boot :)

6mmACW10 Apr 2019 8:36 a.m. PST

I would absolutely just stick to the same base scale in the game without making any adjustments. At 1"=150+ yards and one turn being about an hour, the overall game scale is fairly vague anyway.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP10 Apr 2019 9:48 a.m. PST

The only real issue you will have is adapting scenarios. Your armies cover half the frontage their rules expect (3 widths versus 6 widths).

So, for example, at Gettysburg if 3rd corps should be deployed from Little Round Top to the nearer half of Cemetary ridge, in scale that distance might be 24 widths. But you only have 12 widths of troops to cover it. How will you deal with the gaps?

An easy way is to simply have a "zone of control" that extends each base's flank by 1.5 widths. So two bases with a base width between have no gap – it is covered by the ZOC.

John Leahy Sponsoring Member of TMP10 Apr 2019 11:18 a.m. PST

6mmACW is Greg the author. I'd take his comment as gospel.

wink

Thanks

John

Oathman11 Apr 2019 4:56 a.m. PST

Extra Crispy I totally understand your reasoning and was thinking about it all in that way. My initial thought was to cut all in half since my brigade stands are half of the intended brigade size. I like your idea of a ZOC!

So my mind is set no change of scale and will probably try the ZOC rule :) thanks all for your input in this matter. I was in a stand still but am now looking forward to crunch on.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP11 Apr 2019 5:50 a.m. PST

You could also cut movement trays 6x3. Put your troops in the middle and flock the sides.

coopman12 Apr 2019 5:06 a.m. PST

If Oathman makes his battlefield half the size called for by the scenario, problem solved.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.