Help support TMP


"British Inf. Squad & Platoon Orgs. - 1944?" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Workbench Article

A Soviet T-28 in 28mm

Neil Burt of Troop of Shewe tackles the Soviet T-28 in 28mm scale from Force of Arms.


Featured Profile Article

Report from Spring Gathering V

Paul Glasser reports from Spring Gathering V.


867 hits since 17 Mar 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Thresher0117 Mar 2019 10:17 a.m. PST

I'd like some info on the late-war, British infantry squad and platoon organizations for 1944 and 1945 (Normandy landings and beyond).

IIRC, they were mostly equipped with rifles, and one Bren per squad (3 squads to a platoon, I think). The squad leader(s) might have a pistol, and/or a Sten/Thompson SMG.

I think the strengths were somewhere between 8 – 12 men per squad, but am not really sure (that seems to work for most nations' squads from the era).

I'd like to know the number of men in a squad, and platoon – full permitted strength, and averages in the field.

Info on attachments at the Platoon HQ and Company levels would be very useful too, e.g. Vickers machine guns, PIATS, mortars, and other useful equipment too, I suspect.

Sadly, the BayonetStrength link seems to have gone MIA:

TMP link

While we're at it, might as well ask if there is a difference for infantry units transported in halftracks, and for the Para units too, I suspect, if anyone has good TO&E info for those too?

Starfury Rider17 Mar 2019 10:46 a.m. PST

I am getting bayonetstrength back up and the standard British Infantry Battalion is on there now;

bayonetstrength.uk

Gary

Thresher0117 Mar 2019 11:06 a.m. PST

That's great Gary!

Thanks for sharing.

I assume that "machine carbine" means either a Sten or Thompson SMG for the British lists.

Never read that term before.

Is that correct?

Starfury Rider17 Mar 2019 11:28 a.m. PST

Yes, that was the wartime British terminology for a submachine gun so I stuck with it.

Gary

uglyfatbloke17 Mar 2019 11:56 a.m. PST

Starfury, that's a great thing to do – many thanks on behalf of all lazy people (like me).

Umpapa17 Mar 2019 1:23 p.m. PST

Thanks Gary!

I was using You old site through Way Back Machine.

Personal logo Herkybird Supporting Member of TMP17 Mar 2019 3:26 p.m. PST

Thanks from me too, great resource!

Skarper17 Mar 2019 10:40 p.m. PST

Due to losses and the LOB system UK and Commonwealth sections often had 6-8 men in action. Often only bout 20 men in the whole platoon.

Thresher0117 Mar 2019 11:18 p.m. PST

Thanks for the info.

I thought I'd read that some offensive operations in Normandy/France by the Allies had to be delayed due to infantry losses.

Of course, there were supply bottlenecks as well, due to the lack of deepwater supply ports, and damage to the Mulberry harbours.

Scoman18 Mar 2019 1:39 a.m. PST

Gary, This is a blessing as loved the previous one and all the info. Thanks heaps mate.

Martin Rapier18 Mar 2019 2:06 a.m. PST

I think the main thing is that the British adopted a slightly different approach to the US/Germans/Russians. The battalion had four small rifle companies, not the three rifle companies of other nations, they also didn't have MMGs in a battalion support company (they were concentrated in the divisional MG battalion). They did however have the mysterious battalion 'carrier platoon' which had the same firepower as a rifle company but half the men, and provided an additional reserve of mobile firepower.

At platoon level though, they were much like any other nations platoon, three sections of 6-10 men centred around an LMG, the rest armed with rifles and the odd SMG plus a small platoon HQ with a light mortar. There ws no company level weapons platoon, although sometimes the 2" mortars were concentrated into a company level group. Similarly the AT weapons were notional held a company level but in practice we usually doled out to individual platoons.

During times of the 'great infantry shortage', it was not uncommon to disband one of the rifle companies, the AT platoon and carrier platoon, and distribute the surplus Brens to the remaining infantry, so you'd have a small platoon of 20 or so men with up to six Brens. See e.g. 43 Div in August 1944.

shaun from s and s models18 Mar 2019 2:23 a.m. PST

there was also a 'normandy org' which had all the brens in one unit and all the rifles in another.

Griefbringer18 Mar 2019 2:30 a.m. PST

British infantry squad

In case you haven't realised it yet, British do not use "squad" as an organisational term. Instead, the platoon splits into sections (each of which is typically commanded by a corporal).

Cavalry units have squadron as an organisational term, but that is typically a formation consisting of multiple troops and having a major as the officer commanding. Multiple squadrons are then organised into a regiment, which has a lieutenant colonel as the commanding officer.

If you are used to the military terminology of the former cross-Atlantic colonies, then the British terminology can be a different cup of tea.

Starfury Rider18 Mar 2019 6:59 a.m. PST

Just on Left Out of Battle, I recently got copies of Infantry Notes for 21 Army Group (Nov44 to Apr/May45) and Progress Bulletin (Infantry), or PBI (Jul43 to Mar45). I was hoping one or other might offer some solid info on LoB, but neither gives it even a passing mention, even if only to say 'stop doing it'. I think there's one file that refers to it in the National Archives, so there might be something to be found on its usage.

Gary

Simo Hayha18 Mar 2019 10:04 p.m. PST

Gary, I love your work.

forrester19 Mar 2019 2:45 p.m. PST

Really good to see a reborn bayonet strength.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.