Help support TMP


"USS Gerald R. Ford, Supercarrier With No Urinals" Topic


13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Fight's On Surface-to-Air Missile Site

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian is painting some ground targets as he needs them.


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


Current Poll


1,182 hits since 9 Mar 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0109 Mar 2019 4:46 p.m. PST

"The U.S. Navy's new supercarrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford has had more than its share of problems. The ship has a reported 23 new or modified technologies, a number of which have been problematic, to be kind. They are still working the bugs out of the electromagnetic catapults. The ammunition elevators are not working properly. The propulsion plant has issues. And the list goes on.

One of the complaints has been about the urinals. It is not that they do not work. Rather, there aren't any. The Navy says that this was intentional. As they say in the software business, this is a feature, not a bug. The accommodation blocks have been redesigned to more easily suit both male and female crews. Rather than designate male and female accommodation spaces, with and without urinals, the Navy decided to provide only water closets, making the toilets gender-neutral…"
Main page

link


Amicalement
Armand

goragrad09 Mar 2019 8:43 p.m. PST

That creates a serious loss in efficiency.

Probably more to do with PC than worries about having to reconfigure restrooms.

torokchar Supporting Member of TMP09 Mar 2019 11:59 p.m. PST

And that's why I joined the Army!!!

Thresher0110 Mar 2019 4:02 a.m. PST

Wow, that is rather silly.

Tgerritsen Supporting Member of TMP10 Mar 2019 5:47 a.m. PST

Technically, can't you just urinate over the side? (I kid- but this was a PC decision, not a practical one, so sailors should do what sailors gotta do.)

USAFpilot10 Mar 2019 7:50 a.m. PST

… In the navy
Yes, you can sail the seven seas
In the navy
Yes, you can put your mind at ease
In the navy
Come on now, people, make a stand
In the navy, in the navy
Can't you see we need a hand
In the navy
Come on, protect the mother land
In the navy
Come on and join your fellow man ( or woman, or whatever is pc)

Walking Sailor10 Mar 2019 8:35 a.m. PST

This will end up that the ones that have seats are for women, and the ones without seats are for men.

Cke1st10 Mar 2019 10:14 a.m. PST

Will the women still complain that the men don't put the seat down?

HMS Exeter10 Mar 2019 11:41 a.m. PST

There's always the fantail, depending on the wind.

Bob the Temple Builder10 Mar 2019 11:54 a.m. PST

If you have ever tried to use a urinal during a Force 12 storm, you'd know that it is very much a hit and miss – and mainly miss – affair.

I know of one ocean racing team that has a rule that all crew must use a WC … and to sit or squat whilst doing so. It is safer and there is less 'spillage'.

Tango0110 Mar 2019 3:18 p.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Zephyr110 Mar 2019 9:11 p.m. PST

Surprised they didn't also specify that the seats should also be designed to be used as flotation devices…

Lion in the Stars11 Mar 2019 1:40 a.m. PST

Will the women still complain that the men don't put the seat down?

The ocean is still wet, so yes.

No, seriously, we actually had wire loops to hold the seats up, off the toilets on my sub. You had to put the seat down to 'drop the officers off at the pool' evil grin.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.