"You want modified older rules for existing minis!" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Wargaming in General Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article A cheap way to pick up on the latest fad and get your own dice cup for wargaming?
Featured Profile Article There has been a fire, and  Editor Gwen  has lost everything.
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
 Editor in Chief Bill  | 18 Feb 2019 12:44 p.m. PST |
You were asked – TMP link What is more attractive as a release?34% said "Modified older rules for existing minis"
15% said "Brand-new minis for an older ruleset that is unchanged"
11% said "Brand-new rules for older systems and miniatures" |
| Winston Smith | 18 Feb 2019 8:38 p.m. PST |
New rules? Bah. Humbug.
New figures? Bring them on. The topic begs the question that rules are tied to miniatures and vice versa. I am not in that milieu. Historical gamers rarely are.
Basing systems may be tangentially tied to rules, but figures never.
I can play any number of rules with my basing system for AWI. I can play them all with my figures.
I actually don't have any idea what the winning choice has to do with anything. |
|
