Help support TMP


"untrained elephants at Zama?" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Undead Dinos III

The last - the most elusive - set of dino skellies...


Featured Workbench Article

How to Dip Wargames Factory Plastics & Old Glory Figures

Laconia Hobbies shows us how it is done.


Featured Profile Article

The Gates of Old Jerusalem

The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.


Featured Book Review


860 hits since 8 Feb 2019
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

MichaelCollinsHimself08 Feb 2019 5:45 a.m. PST

Can anyone tell me who it was suggested that Hannibal`s elephants at the battle of Zama were untrained or inexperienced?

TIA,

Mike.

Musketballs08 Feb 2019 8:09 a.m. PST

Don't know how much this helps, but it was Livy who supplied the detail of many elephants fleeing just from the noise of battle, with only a few breaking through the Velites and reaching the main Roman line.

MichaelCollinsHimself08 Feb 2019 8:54 a.m. PST

Yeah thanks Musketballs,
I know I`ve seen it in Richard A. Gabriel`s books on Hannibal and Scipio (2008/2011), but I wondered if it was his or an earlier historian`s theory.
I also remember it being included in that Hannibal movie with Alexander Siddig in 2006.

Grunt186108 Feb 2019 8:54 a.m. PST

Not only were Hannibal's elephants untrained, but a large portion of his army as well. Thus the reason Hannibal attempted to broker a peace treaty with Scipio before the battle. Hannibal needed more time to get his army ready to fight. Unfortunately for Hannibal and the Carthaginians, Scipio knew this.

MichaelCollinsHimself08 Feb 2019 8:56 a.m. PST

Right so, who was it that first said that the elephants were untrained?

GurKhan08 Feb 2019 9:36 a.m. PST

I think the view that they were untrained may have arisen from Polybios' statement (XV.16.2) that Hannibal had collected the elephants "hastily".

There's a discussion in the thread at link – although it starts off on a different subject – but we didn't really find out who first floated the "untrained" idea.

MichaelCollinsHimself09 Feb 2019 9:40 a.m. PST

My mistake… just watched the Hannibal movie – the screen-writer just has Hannibal say that he has "an army of raw, untrained recruits" to fight at Zama.

YouTube link

markdienekes27 Feb 2019 7:12 a.m. PST

The main thinking is if they had a trained elephant core, why hadn't they been used in one of the numerous battles in Africa before Hannibal returned to Africa?

MichaelCollinsHimself03 Apr 2019 9:34 a.m. PST

Interesting question Mark.
It depends on who you wish to believe.
Polybius does not mention elephants at the battles of Utica or the Great Plains, but Livy gives elephant losses for this part of the war = 14.
Polybius saves 80 of them for Hannibal at the battle of Zama alone it would appear.
Appian says that Hasdrubal had 140 elephants, but he does not mention the battle of the Great Plains at all.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.