Help support TMP


"You don't game the Spanish-American War..." Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Spanish-American War Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Mighty Armies: Fantasy


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Constructing the Japanese Patrol Aeronef Moni

dampfpanzerwagon Fezian scratchbuilds another Victorian flying machine.


Featured Book Review


1,421 hits since 31 Dec 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian31 Dec 2018 5:46 p.m. PST

You were asked – TMP link

Do you game this war on the miniature tabletop?

49% said "no"
21% said "not yet"
15% said "yes, naval only"

Col Durnford31 Dec 2018 6:12 p.m. PST

We true elites do the land action.

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP01 Jan 2019 8:06 a.m. PST

The land war in Cuba between the U.S. and Spain seems too 1-sided and short, though I suppose bringing in Cuban guerrillas would allow for the earlier battles with Spanish troops trying to snuff out the rebellion. Add in Filipino guerrillas that can fight the Spanish followed by the Americans in a fairly long war. Finally the U.S. Army and Marines can serve in the Boxer Rebellion.

Personal logo The Virtual Armchair General Sponsoring Member of TMP01 Jan 2019 1:33 p.m. PST

It may have seemed "one-sided," but a fuller appreciation of what happened on the actual battlefields shows it was anything but.

Tactically, the Spanish were far superior to the Yanqui's, and a proper set of dedicated rules can reflect this and make the actual--and certainly any number of "what if"--battles anything but predictable!

TVAG

Col Durnford02 Jan 2019 7:52 a.m. PST

The land war could be far less one sided that the naval action.

A big part of the problem was that in both cases the Spanish did not have their heart in the fight. Spain against the Cuban rebels can make for an interesting game. I have run Escario's column from Manzanillo as a three battle campaign a few times and it was quite enjoyable.

spanamwar.com/escario.htm

Brooklyn Wargamer10 Jan 2019 10:56 a.m. PST

Hello:

What VCarter and TVAG have said about the Spanish is true. Mostly the hesitance was from the command level. Spanish troops mostly had good training, experience and good weapons.

coolyork10 Jan 2019 4:58 p.m. PST

It is true there are only a hand full of actual land battles in Cuba , but at least three of them can be fought in multiple phases . El Caney , San Juan Heights and Guantanamo Bay can be fought in two to three battles each . The Spanish have a much better chance to win then say the Zulu , Sudanese , Egyptians etc… and that dosent stop anyone from gaming that ! ( Put Veteran Spanish troops in the trenches with Mausers at Tel El Kebir and the British have a tougher day for sure!)

marco56 Supporting Member of TMP13 Jan 2019 10:57 a.m. PST

Yes the Spanish were much better than given credit for.
Mark

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.