Help support TMP


"Good Cause? Doesn't Matter..." Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the General Historical Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Lemax Christmas Trees

It's probably too late already this season to snatch these bargains up...


Featured Workbench Article

Staples Online Printing & Web Binding

The Editor dabbles with online printing.


Featured Profile Article

My Wargaming Blood Revealed

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets his DNA results, and starts thinking about wargaming.


Current Poll


654 hits since 28 Dec 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian28 Dec 2018 3:05 p.m. PST

You were asked – TMP link

According to historian Roger J. Spiller, fighting for a 'great and moral cause' makes no difference.

…Soldiering is a morally neutral act, so designed by centuries of tradition. Soldiers have fought bravely and well for the most despicable of causes, and the Second World War lasted for six years because millions of soldiers did exactly that…

Do you agree?

46% said "yes, I agree"
38% said "no, I disagree"

Winston Smith28 Dec 2018 3:33 p.m. PST

Meaningless.
How many German soldiers thought they were not fighting for a "good cause"?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian28 Dec 2018 3:45 p.m. PST

How many German soldiers thought they were not fighting for a "good cause"?

I know of one who knew it was wrong, he said he always fired to miss. grin

goragrad28 Dec 2018 8:13 p.m. PST

Exactly Winston – between patriotism and propaganda the majority of soldiers believe in their cause.

Winston Smith29 Dec 2018 9:48 a.m. PST

How do you survive the war if you shoot to miss all the time?

Dynaman878929 Dec 2018 9:53 a.m. PST

If your squad mates are shooting and hitting helps.

Korvessa29 Dec 2018 11:21 a.m. PST

I think lots of people shoot to miss in a war.
If it is true that it takes 1000s of rounds fired for every one killed by small arms, I suspect that most infantrymen didn't kill anyone.

Aethelflaeda was framed29 Dec 2018 12:48 p.m. PST

In theory, one who shoots to miss, is not really fighting for the cause his uniform may indicate. He might well be construed as fighting for the other side.

Fighting is never morally neutral. You either agree that the end has justified the need for war or you don't. Whether you have the power to not fo fight in a conflict is the only real problem. Just following orders is not an excuse but it can be mitigated sometimes if you are forced to follow orders and lack the power to rebel.

Tom D131 Dec 2018 7:40 p.m. PST

I knew a Hungarian, an ethnic German. The German army came into his town and took all the Germans in his high school class. Next thing he knew he was on the Russian front. No moral choice, just survival. An American of the same generation, in fact his co-worker, landed in North Africa with a card in French and Arabic (Morroccan?) saying the Americans were their friends, but " We were gonna shoot anything that moved". War is Hell.

Aethelflaeda was framed01 Jan 2019 12:20 p.m. PST

The fact that he did not volunteer, but was coerced is a slight mitigation but showed he had still made a moral choice: cooperate and possibly kill some one else, or be killed himself. He could have fled to the mountains. He had a choice but granted a tough one.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.