Help support TMP


"Jackson's Valley Campaign - It's Brilliant!" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Project Completion: 1:72 Scale ACW Union Army

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian feels it's important to celebrate progress in one's personal hobby life.


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


777 hits since 21 Dec 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian21 Dec 2018 6:09 p.m. PST

You were asked – TMP link

Which Civil War military operation would you consider to be the most brilliant?

30% said "Jackson's Valley Campaign"
27% said "Vicksburg"
12% said "Lee's Seven Days Campaign"

Wackmole921 Dec 2018 6:21 p.m. PST

Vicksburg lead to final victory and the opening of the Mississippi river. Valley lead to at best a stalemate and a future defeat.

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP21 Dec 2018 7:39 p.m. PST

True, Wackmole, and I voted for Vicksburg--but not for that reason. The question wasn't which campaign was most decisive, but which was most brilliant. If it has to be decisive, no campaign by the side which lost the war can ever be considered.

Wackmole921 Dec 2018 11:55 p.m. PST

Do you think Brilliance is a measure of Skill or the Poor quality of one's Opponents.

donlowry22 Dec 2018 10:01 a.m. PST

Understanding the limitations of your opponent(s) is part of brilliance. But having opponents of poor quality certainly makes it easier to look brilliant.

In Jackson's case it helped a lot that he was up against a divided Union command -- Banks, Shields and Fremont (and Fremont was about as poor as they came).

So was Grant in the Vicksburg campaign -- Pemberton and Johnston (and Pemberton was down there with Fremont).

Lee was up against McClellan, 'nuff said.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.