Help support TMP


"Three Reasons the British Should Have Won the ..." Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Acolyte Vampires - Based

The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


Featured Book Review


633 hits since 27 Nov 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0127 Nov 2018 4:14 p.m. PST

….Revolutionary War (and Three Reasons the Patriots Did Win)

"George Washington called the American victory in the Revolutionary war "little short of a standing miracle." In 1776, an overwhelming British army had defeated his poorly trained force, driven them out of New York City, and chased them across New Jersey. Washington then lost Philadelphia, and his men had barely survived the wretched winter at Valley Forge. In 1780, the British captured the major southern port at Charleston, imprisoning the American garrison there, and utterly defeated a second patriot army. Before that year was out, his long-suffering troops were on the verge of mutiny and one of his senior generals had gone over to the enemy…."
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Andrew Walters28 Nov 2018 9:42 a.m. PST

Neat article!

But it doesn't stress the value of GW personally. His success in each area of a commander's job was critical. Plenty of mistakes, sure, but it could not have held together without someone remarkable in that job.

Tango0128 Nov 2018 11:28 a.m. PST

Glad you enjoyed it my friend!. (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

gladue29 Nov 2018 1:43 p.m. PST

The perseverance part is spot on, except that it was in large part non military perseverance that caused the colonists to win. The British could control anyplace they put their army, but they didn't have anywhere near the army, nor the money, to control the whole area. Whenever the Brits pacified an area and left, it just reverted back to Colonial control. It made the whole thing into an exercise in cat herding. Once the French entered, it was all clearly pointless and absurdly expensive.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.