Help support TMP


"Why Did George Washington Join the Revolution?" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

De Bellis Antiquitatis (DBA)


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


969 hits since 24 Nov 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0124 Nov 2018 9:23 p.m. PST

"A close examination of some of Washington's writings provides many clues as to why Washington joined the Revolutionary War…."
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP25 Nov 2018 6:30 a.m. PST

You know, the best thing the British could have done after the Seven Years/French and Indian War was made Washington a peer and had him raise a Royal regiment in Virginia

Tango0125 Nov 2018 3:11 p.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

oldnorthstate25 Nov 2018 9:15 p.m. PST

The letter documents his obvious sense of frustration and disgust at the manner in which the colonists were treated by the British professionals in the FI War, but it is a stretch to suggest it has much of anything to do with his decision to align himself with the revolutionists in the years leading up to the revolution.

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP25 Nov 2018 9:26 p.m. PST

To get to the other side?
evil grin

Old Contemptibles25 Nov 2018 10:55 p.m. PST

He was tired of paying top dollar for British imports and in return receive poor quality goods. He believed the British merchants were purposely ripping the Americans off. That is why he began producing everything he could in Virginia.

There were always the threat the British could cut off the slave trade. He tried to get a British officers commission but was turned down. Just a few here. I am sure there are more but when it comes down to it, money seems to be the number one reason for many of the Founders.

coopman26 Nov 2018 6:37 a.m. PST

He was rather fond of winning.

Winston Smith26 Nov 2018 10:50 a.m. PST

A lot of Americans joined because they thought they were disrespected for being Americans.
"Taxation without representation" was just one facet.
Not being allowed to join the British army as an officer.
Provincial ranks being inferior despite being equivalent.

Had the British treated the Colonies as part of Britain, rather than … the Colonies, would have been far better for all concerned.
The rebelling colonists felt slighted. At least the big shots, who are always the ones who really count. grin
George was certainly a Big Shot.

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP26 Nov 2018 11:35 a.m. PST

Even the little shots felt pretty well slightly. Patriotic colonists had turned out in great numbers to volunteer for service in the French and Indian War; only to be poorly treated at every turn by the regular army during that war. Then very shortly afterwards when that regular army came back as a large and hostile occupying force with an already established disdain for the colonists, things didn't get better.

epturner26 Nov 2018 11:47 a.m. PST

Winston;
"Disrespected" is not a verb.

Forsooth.

Eric

Winston Smith26 Nov 2018 1:10 p.m. PST

Of course it is.
He often said to Jefferson and Hancock, "They was dissin' me, Man!"

Florida Tory26 Nov 2018 4:17 p.m. PST

According to the Grammarphobia blog, the Oxford English Dictionary has a citation of disrespect used as a verb dating from 1614.

link

Winston Smith26 Nov 2018 5:28 p.m. PST

By extension, as you say, the short form "dis" makes a lot of sense. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language now recognizes "dis" as an "informal" verb meaning "to show disrespect to" someone.

Oooh. Informal verbs!

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP26 Nov 2018 5:31 p.m. PST

And we have a citation right here from 26 Nov 2018 9:50 a.m. PST!

42flanker27 Nov 2018 12:00 p.m. PST

"Patriotic colonists had turned out in great numbers to volunteer for service in the French and Indian War; only to be poorly treated at every turn by the regular army during that war."

THere are contemporary sources which suggest that auxiliary forces drawn from the the Colonies to support the Crown forces in the F&IW did not always cover themselves with glory.

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP27 Nov 2018 2:30 p.m. PST

We also have contemporary sources showing that the Provincial forces were assigned overwhelmingly to fatigue details and guard duty that kept them exhausted and with precious little time for any training before combat. They were malnourished to the point of starvation and often too physically weak from hunger to even effectively perform the continuous fatigue details They were lucky to have tallied a week's worth of firearm training before being committed to battle. All while being derided by the regular officers and soldiers for being bad troops.

They were indeed bad 'regular troops'. What they were was very highly motivated and dedicated auxiliaries. The regulars had no concept of how to incorporate them as auxiliaries.

This generation of young Provinicials from across the colonies formed a collective [and generally negative] experience of dealing with the regular army. They would go on to be the older community leaders come the revolution. That was a huge flip from starting out as exceedingly loyal volunteers who served the crown.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.