Help support TMP


"Iran Had Secret Plans to Build Five Nuclear Warheads" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:300 Zelda APCs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds APCs to his Israeli forces.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting Hasslefree's Not Hot Fuzz Nick & Sam

Personal logo Dentatus Sponsoring Member of TMP Fezian tackles two subjects from his favorite sculptor.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


Current Poll


498 hits since 21 Nov 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0121 Nov 2018 10:21 p.m. PST

"A new bombshell report based on a secret trove of seized Iranian nuclear documents shows the Islamic Republic had concrete plans to manufacture and build at least five nuclear weapons and that it was much further along in this scheme than previously known by the international community.

Iran's contested nuclear weapons program was much further along than the international community thought, according to a report based on scores of secret Iranian plans seized by Israel and publicly disclosed for the first time earlier this year.


Information obtained in this raid on Iran's secretive nuclear files has revealed that Tehran was well along the path to building several nuclear weapons by around 2003, including the complex infrastructure needed to produce such weapons, according to a new report from the Institute for Science and International Society, a nuclear watchdog group that has exposed in the past the extent of Iran's nuclear works…."
Msin page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Thresher0121 Nov 2018 10:45 p.m. PST

They've already got some, but I suspect we don't know how many, just like NK.

This shouldn't be surprising since for a couple of decades now, we've been told by "the analysts" that Iran could build a nuke in 6 months to 2 years. Sadly, many in "the international community" have downplayed the threat for several decades too, and it is a fait accompli.

They've reportedly got between 60 – 120 in North Korea. My guess it's more towards the larger number than the smaller one there.

Lion in the Stars22 Nov 2018 12:39 a.m. PST

What is this "had" plans nonsense?

If they don't have nukes yet, they'd be fools to not have plans to make some!

Tango0122 Nov 2018 2:47 p.m. PST

Serious or not serious plans…? (smile)


Amicalement
Armamd

Thresher0122 Nov 2018 5:26 p.m. PST

I'm sure they're just for "fun" Armand.

They probably feel left out, and want to emulate what the Russians and North Koreans do to help us celebrate our Independence day festivities, like sending Russian long-range bombers that can carry nuke warheads close to our shores, or firing off ballistic missiles for a really big bang, over our Japanese ally's islands, like the North Koreans seem to prefer to do.

15mm and 28mm Fanatik22 Nov 2018 6:14 p.m. PST

The only country to voluntarily give up its nukes was South Africa, and that would not have happened if not for Apartheid.

Tango0123 Nov 2018 11:54 a.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars23 Nov 2018 2:33 p.m. PST

@28mm: No, the Ukraine gave up all their Soviet-era nukes in exchange for territorial guarantees from the US and Russia.

Sadly, the Crimea mess has shown that if you have nukes, you get away with things. And probably made most every mid-size nation (big economy but no nukes) want nukes.

15mm and 28mm Fanatik23 Nov 2018 7:59 p.m. PST

Forgot about Ukraine. Yeah, it was voluntary but due to economic woes Ukraine also allowed her conventional forces to wither so it's entirely possible they would have given up the aging Soviet-era nukes anyway rather than spend the money to maintain and modernize them.

At the time Russia was weak and posed no threat, and NATO wasn't expanding eastward so it's easy to see why they made that decision.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.