Help support TMP


"Marines Want Robot Vehicles to Carry Infantry Packs " Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Buys: London Taxi from Matchbox

"Hefty" metal die-cast cars are cheap this time of year.


Featured Profile Article

Ammunition Hill 1967

Ammunition Hill was the most fortified Jordanian position that the Israelis faced in 1967.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


480 hits since 8 Nov 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0108 Nov 2018 9:31 p.m. PST

…into Battle

"The Marine Corps has put out a request to learn whether defense firms can build an unmanned robotic vehicle designed to carry extra ammo, packs, food and water for infantry squads. The effort follows an Army initiative to select an unmanned squad vehicle that can partner with infantrymen to lighten their loads.

"The Marine Corps Rapid Capabilities Office … plans to investigate unmanned vehicle technologies to displace the load currently carried by Infantry Marines at the squad level. Capabilities of interest include ground vehicles with tele-operation capability … and fully autonomous operation," according to an Oct. 31 request for information posted on the government contracting website FedBizOpps…"

Main page

link

Amicalement
Armand

Thresher0108 Nov 2018 9:52 p.m. PST

I want a flying car……..

Seems to me mules, and/or horses would be cheaper, and quicker to field.

I'll bet the Marines get what they want, before I do.

Stryderg09 Nov 2018 7:44 a.m. PST

Animals would be cheaper, but (there's always a but),
* they could be bigger targets than a squat little robot
* they may be harder to ship than a robot (due to feed, clean up and space requirements)
* they don't always do what they are told (ok, the robots may not do that either)
* PETA has a larger membership than PETR (people for the ethical treatment of robots)

And you are correct, they'll get it before we get our flying cars and jet packs.

Tango0109 Nov 2018 10:55 a.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars09 Nov 2018 2:57 p.m. PST

Did someone say Boston Dynamics BigDog with a better muffler?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.