Help support TMP


"US Army Wants New Bullets" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the French and Indian Wars Message Board

Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Workbench Article

Back to Paper Modeling - with the Hoverfly

The Editor returns to paper modeling after a long absence.


Featured Profile Article

Visiting with Wargame Ruins

The Editor takes a tour of resin scenics manufacturer Wargame Ruins, and in the process gets some painting tips...


833 hits since 1 Nov 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0101 Nov 2018 12:25 p.m. PST

DA BUG

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian01 Nov 2018 12:25 p.m. PST

The Army has been working on a new bullet that is bigger, bolder and harder hitting that will help make U.S. soldiers even more unstoppable…

link

22ndFoot01 Nov 2018 12:57 p.m. PST

After getting everybody else to drop the 7.62 in favour of the 5.56. Genius.

Lion in the Stars01 Nov 2018 6:39 p.m. PST

That was almost 60 years ago, 22ndFoot.

Ironically, the 6.5 Grendel is ballisticly identical to the old 6.5mm Arisaka the Japanese used in WW2! Grendel was designed to get 7.62NATO range and punch in a 5.56 length.

Though this is apparently a whole different ballgame than the 6.8SPC (which was designed to get more punch than 5.56 out to about 300m). The description makes it sound more like the British .280/30 cartridge from the 1950s.


From left to right: 6mm SAW, 6.5mm Grendel, 6.8mm SPC, 7mm Bench Rest, .280/30 British, 7 mm-08, 7mm Second Optimum (Liviano), .276 Pedersen, .308×1.75", 7.62×51mm NATO.

6.8mm means .270 caliber bullets (which are actually 0.277" in diameter, 7mm are 0.284").

And no mention of whether this is using brass cases, plastic case-telescoped, or caseless.

dragon6 Supporting Member of TMP01 Nov 2018 8:28 p.m. PST

So another 6.8 cartridge. I wouldn't get my hopes up about it coming true.

22ndFoot02 Nov 2018 6:48 a.m. PST

Lion in the Stars,

It may have taken the US Army sixty years to recognise it but it was a dumb idea whenever the decision was made.

I remember hauling round 100 rounds of 7.62 ball and 300 of link in Her Majesty's service – it was damned heavy but at least you knew that what you hit would stay hit.

Lobsterback02 Nov 2018 12:59 p.m. PST

If my history serves me correctly, the UK actually pioneered the 6.8/.280cal as a battle rifle cartridge immediately following the end of WW2 citing better ballistics and controllability in semiauto/select-fire weapons. The rifle was the bull-pup EM2. The US went with the 7.62mm instead and we know where that went. Interesting to see things going full circle again.

Lion in the Stars02 Nov 2018 5:26 p.m. PST

@Lobsterback: Not quite, the M1 garand was originally intended to use that .276 Pedersen round, but the Army insisted on .30-06.

I just find it deeply ironic that the various militaries are working back to ~6.Xmm with ballistics identical to stuff from over a hundred years ago (either 6.5 Arisaka or 6.5 Swede).

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.