Help support TMP


"Review candidates to replace M2 Bradley armored IFV " Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Beer and Pretzels Skirmish (BAPS)


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

The Editor Can't Paint Green Vehicles

Does anyone else have trouble with the color green on microscale vehicles?


Featured Profile Article


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


951 hits since 16 Oct 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0116 Oct 2018 9:20 p.m. PST

….for NGCV U.S. Army.

"The U.S. Army wants a new ICV infantry Combat Vehicle to accompany the M1A2 Abrams MBT into battle. The vehicle would take over the M2A3 Bradley's role in carrying a squad of infantry across the fast-moving battlefields, along with a limited fighting capability. Three manufacturers are working on the competition for what the Army calls the Next Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV)…."

picture


Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars17 Oct 2018 4:02 a.m. PST

I really can't see the Griffin III winning, not with a capacity of 6.

CV90 would be my preference, that's a solid platform with all the bugs worked out.

It will probably be the Lynx, though.

Personal logo javelin98 Supporting Member of TMP17 Oct 2018 1:58 p.m. PST

The CV90 family would be the winner in my mind. All the variants are already in production (IFV, mortar, air defense, engineer, ambulance, C3V, etc.), the family has been extensively field-tested, and it's already NATO-compatible. Plus, the AJAX/Lynx concept and Griffin III are heavily overweight at well over 40 tons, which raises questions of being able to cross bridges with a lighter MLC, as may be found in Europe and Korea. The M113 was only 13 tons, the Bradley was 27 tons, and the CV90 comes in at about 23 tons for the basic IFV. That weight limits air portability, as well.

EnemyAce17 Oct 2018 3:55 p.m. PST

Hilarious that they just get the paladin and new m113-type replacement all on the Bradley chassis/suspension for efficiency that they start changing them up again.

Tango0118 Oct 2018 12:16 p.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars18 Oct 2018 1:45 p.m. PST

@Enemy Ace: Given how long the procurement cycle is, we should be replacing the Paladins about the time the NGCV rolls out.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.