"Did the Hundred Years War against France strengthen...." Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Movie Review
|
Tango01 | 31 Aug 2018 10:11 p.m. PST |
….a sense of English national identity? "In 1337, King Philip VI of France confiscated the duchy of Aquitaine, a territory in south-west France, from Edward III, king of England (Image 1: link The duchy had been attached to the English crown since Henry II's marriage to Eleanor of Aquitaine in 1152, but the king of France now wanted to bring it more firmly under French royal control. Tensions had been building for some time, but the final straw came when Edward III allowed a rebel against Philip VI, named Robert of Artois, to shelter in Aquitaine. In response, Philip confiscated the duchy. The stakes were raised further in 1340 when Edward III claimed the French throne himself by descent from his mother Isabella, a French princess. These events marked the beginning of the long-running conflict between England and France which lasted until 1453 and became known as the ‘Hundred Years War' Initially, the conflict was not so much a national war between England and France as a dynastic conflict between two monarchs over a particular territory. Consequently, Edward III had to persuade the English population to view the war as a conflict not just between two kings but between two entire kingdoms and their inhabitants. This would enable him to draw on a much broader basis of support for the war….." Main page link Amicalement Armand
|
KSmyth | 31 Aug 2018 10:40 p.m. PST |
Perhaps in the early part of Edward's reign, but as the burden of taxation dragged on, parliament, the nobles, attacked the cost of the war. All English kings would eventually face a parliament that insisted the cost of the war be borne by the king's household, hence the diminishing English War effort near at the end of Edward III's reign until the succession of Henry V. But even the Great Harry was facing parliamentary revolt against the cost of the war by the time of his death. |
Wackmole9 | 01 Sep 2018 10:44 a.m. PST |
The really question was did it infuses England with hard currency from ransoms. It clearly made France poorer and England richier, but in the end it just flowed back to France. |
|