Help support TMP


"A Little about Figure Style " Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 18th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


851 hits since 4 Aug 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0104 Aug 2018 9:51 p.m. PST

"I recently attended a rather enjoyable wargaming weekend to help with running a large C18th game, using Charles's Grant's excellent "The Wargame" rules (other rules sets are available, ……they're just not as good! )

Anyway, the after dinner drinks discussion ranged far and wide, but at one point touched on the fact that the Crann Tara style figures look like they have been on a starvation diet etc…."

picture

picture

Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

BillyNM05 Aug 2018 6:05 a.m. PST

The Cran Tara figure is much the better of the two anatomically, although the legs look a tad odd as the hip is too low. If the leg was lengthened with the hip a bit higher up it'd be perfect. By comparison the Front Rank is really dwarfish mainly due to the stocky proportions and over large head. FR also suffer from legs coming out of the waist owing to absence of the lower abdomen and pelvis – a real shame as the sculpting is first class and I was strongly tempted by their WSS range.

18CTEXAN05 Aug 2018 6:51 a.m. PST

Careful! Some of us look "identical" to Front Rank figures….stocky, with overly large heads (but not necessarily large brains) and "dwarfish"! Probably from eating too much BBQ! …LOL!
Cheers!

Joes Shop Supporting Member of TMP05 Aug 2018 8:07 a.m. PST

BillyNM: +1

Personal logo optional field Supporting Member of TMP05 Aug 2018 8:16 a.m. PST

When I first started painting figs I really was bothered by the way the heads (and hands) were so oversized. The reminded me of toddlers and it seemed weird to paint them with weapons in their hands.

Now after years and years, I'm so accustomed to those odd proportions correctly proportioned figures seem odd… but I'm terrible at painting faces, so maybe I'll give them a go.

Garde de Paris05 Aug 2018 11:28 a.m. PST

I took pictures of my Victrix plastic 40-figures unit of the 9th Foot – Peninsular war-to show to friends, and they both said, "what are those? Hobbits?"


My Napoleonic French for Spain are almost all converted Stadden 30mm for my infantry – very much toward the style of the figure on the right.


GdeP

Costanzo106 Aug 2018 10:49 a.m. PST

Crann Tara up, Front Rank old.

18th Century Guy Supporting Member of TMP06 Aug 2018 4:56 p.m. PST

Although I somewhat understand the "anatomically correct" figures for me they are not as appealing. The main reason is because there is less surface area to paint and by having more surface area you, potentially, can have more color. I like 18th century uniforms because there are so many different nations involved and some of them are quite colorful.
So I don't mind the "heroic" sculpts at all, unless they are WAY out of proportion because I have the opportunity to put more color on the figure which means more color on the table and, for me, that's what makes our games so enjoyable.
Lastly, I fully agree with 18C Texan. Way too much BBQ!

von Schwartz07 Aug 2018 4:30 p.m. PST

Ditto to 18th Century Guy

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.