Help support TMP


"Wrong Tiger Syndrome in Brad Pitt's 'Fury'" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
World War Two in the Air

Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Workbench Article

Marines to the Ukraine!

When you have several hundred Marines that need painting, who do you call?


Current Poll


657 hits since 16 Jul 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
15mm and 28mm Fanatik16 Jul 2018 9:46 a.m. PST

While I can overlook the vanishing panzerfaustes during the climactic assault scene in this movie, the fact that the Tiger borrowed from the Bovington Museum used in the movie is clearly an "early production" Tiger is just soooo wrong. Can't they tell the glaring visual differences between an early, mid and late production Tiger???!!!

Joes Shop Supporting Member of TMP16 Jul 2018 9:51 a.m. PST

Yes, you have WTS!

Alcibiades16 Jul 2018 10:04 a.m. PST

"Battle of the Bulge" must drive you crazy…lol…

bz1bz1 Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Jul 2018 10:26 a.m. PST

Did the use of a M4A2 bother you to the same extent?

Patrick R16 Jul 2018 10:45 a.m. PST

In the final months of the war they encountered various vehicles that were either used for training or demonstrations that were pressed into service. I can accept that this Tiger was used for such purposes and sent into combat with a green crew, which explains their weird behaviour in battle.

Garand16 Jul 2018 10:45 a.m. PST

I don't think there were many (if any?) shots of Fury from the engine deck or rear quarter that you could identify it as an M4A2(76)W…

Edit: there were still early Tigers in service at the end of the war. IIRC Grossdeuschland had several rebuilds with early features, so theoretically possible. More glaring is that they did not repaint the Tiger, & still sported its North Africa color scheme. That's a bit more pedantry for you…

In the end, I was far less bothered by that than many of the other issues with the movie…

Damon.

bz1bz1 Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Jul 2018 11:00 a.m. PST

The only good thing about Fury was the money that Bovington hopefully made out of it. The film was complete rubbish.

Joes Shop Supporting Member of TMP16 Jul 2018 11:14 a.m. PST

And everyone is entitled to their opinion…

15mm and 28mm Fanatik16 Jul 2018 11:31 a.m. PST

Now we know how the "Napoleonics" gamers feel, haha.

Korvessa16 Jul 2018 11:31 a.m. PST

I sense sarcasm in the OP

Personal logo Dentatus Sponsoring Member of TMP Fezian16 Jul 2018 11:41 a.m. PST

Never get your history – or your theology – from a movie. I found 'Fury' quite entertaining tho.

If I want WWII history, I'll put on 'World at War'.

Oppiedog16 Jul 2018 11:41 a.m. PST

…well, it wasn't "True" '25 scale, so…

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP16 Jul 2018 11:58 a.m. PST

I agree with Patrick R – why would a perfectly good Tiger drive towards some Shermans?

bz1bz1 Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Jul 2018 12:01 p.m. PST

Obviously 20mm is the one true scale for WWII. Anything else is just wrong.

15mm and 28mm Fanatik16 Jul 2018 1:59 p.m. PST

Despite the stupidity of the Tiger advancing towards the Shermans and letting Fury shoot and disable it from the rear instead of just sitting back and picking them off one by one, the scene is pretty cool I guess.

youtu.be/L8vFGQ0uJQc

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.