Help support TMP


"Game 3 WW2 Naval Campaign " Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board

Back to the WWII Naval Gallery Message Board

Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board

Back to the WWII Battle Reports Message Board

Back to the Blogs of War Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea

Featured Ruleset

Phil Dunn's Sea Battle Games


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Small Scale Ships with M.Y. Miniatures

Mal Wright Fezian's first experience with 1:4800 scale naval models.


Featured Profile Article

Poker Set at Dollar Tree

Poker chips are back at the dollar store!


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,332 hits since 6 Jun 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
yarkshire gamer06 Jun 2018 9:48 a.m. PST

picture

link

I know you've been waiting for this :-), game 3 of our 1941 Atlantic Naval Campaign.

An interesting match up this week, a David and Goliath contest as a Danish armed merchant takes on two, yes two German Battlecruisers. All that and it's based on a real event.

A nice little evening game and something a bit different, part 4 coming soon.

Regards Ken
The Yarkshire Gamer

fantasque07 Jun 2018 2:03 a.m. PST

Thanks for posting that. An interesting and unusual scenario. Balance is not everything!

4th Cuirassier12 Jun 2018 9:33 a.m. PST

Weren't Scharnhorst and Gneisenau called battleships by zer Germans?

4th Cuirassier12 Jun 2018 9:33 a.m. PST

Anyone know what these error messages across the top of the screen mean?

/mivacommon/boards/topics.mv: Line 612: MvUPDATE: Runtime Error: Record is not in index /mivacommon/boards/topics.mv: Line 612: MvUPDATE: Runtime Error: Record is not in index /mivacommon/boards/topics.mv: Line 612: MvUPDATE: Runtime Error: Record is not in index

Mark 1 Supporting Member of TMP12 Jun 2018 1:53 p.m. PST

Anyone know what these error messages across the top of the screen mean?

/mivacommon/boards/topics.mv: Line 612: MvUPDATE: Runtime Error: Record is not in index /mivacommon/boards/topics.mv: Line 612: MvUPDATE: Runtime Error: Record is not in index /mivacommon/boards/topics.mv: Line 612: MvUPDATE: Runtime Error: Record is not in index


Your record is not an index? Oh, that's very bad, 4th C.

The daemon is out to get you*. It's runtime, mate! I suggest you pack up all your micro-armor and mail it to me right away for safe keeping. Just in case, you know. Just in case …

-Mark
(aka: Mk 1)

*Note: Actually it just belched at you a little. Maybe not out to get you per se ….

4th Cuirassier13 Jun 2018 1:43 a.m. PST

I was concerned that maybe I had been singled out for special treatment.

Mark 1 Supporting Member of TMP13 Jun 2018 11:19 a.m. PST

Actually I've gotten the same error message about 4 times over the past 2 days.

Doesn't seem to stop me from posting or reading. So I just carry on. So far.

But if you observe that I stop posting in the next few days, put your tinfoil hat on right away. Can't be too careful.

-Mark
(aka: Mk 1)

yarkshire gamer14 Jun 2018 10:44 a.m. PST

4th Cuirass they are named both as Battlecruiser and Battleship, BC speed and guns with BB armour. Hard as nails as we have found out during the course of this Campaign.

sjpatejak28 Jun 2018 10:34 p.m. PST

"Weren't Scharnhorst and Gneisenau called battleships by zer Germans?"

Nein! Schlachtkreuzer

Mark 1 Supporting Member of TMP29 Jun 2018 1:17 p.m. PST

Actually, I have not found many sources in German that describe either of the sisters as Schlactkreuzer (battlecruiser). Rather, they seem to be consistently labeled as Schlachtschiffe (battleship) … nicht war?

For example:

Die Scharnhorst war das Typschiff der nach ihr benannten Klasse von zwei Schiffen. Ihr Schwesterschiff war die Gneisenau. Ihr auffälligstes Merkmal war die für Schlachtschiffe schwache Hauptbewaffnung mit einem Kaliber von nur 28 cm.

The Scharnhorst was the lead ship of the named class of two ships. Her sister ship was the Gneisenau. Their most striking feature was the weak main armament for battleships with a caliber of only 28 cm.

From: link

Or:

Am 26. Dezember 1943 griff das deutsche Schlachtschiff „Scharnhorst" einen Konvoi im Eismeer an.

On December 26, 1943 the German battleship "Scharnhorst" attacked a convoy in the Arctic Ocean.

From: link

Neither is a primary source. I don't have much on naval matters. But current German language histories seem to be pretty consistent in labeling the sisters as battelships.

-Mark
(aka: Mk 1)

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.