Help support TMP


"Spiking the Gun Myth" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Top-Rated Ruleset

Fire and Steel


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


1,150 hits since 21 May 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0121 May 2018 12:44 p.m. PST

"For many Americans, the gun is a holy object, the emblem and guarantor of their identity. Without it, they would not be the self-sufficient persons they consider themselves, the very models for all lovers of freedom. To take away this external prop would tear out of them their very essence. This private conviction is verified, in their eyes, by a public fact -- that American history, separateness and virtue have always been associated with the gun, if (in fact) they did not take their very essence from it.

Imagine, then, the shock if this star of the show should turn out to be missing through much of our history. It seems impossible; and that was the reaction of Michael A. Bellesiles, a Colonial historian at Emory University, when -- while searching through over a thousand probate records from the frontier sections of New England and Pennsylvania for 1763 to 1790 -- he found that only 14 percent of the men owned guns, and over half of those guns were unusable…."
Main page
link

Amicalement
Armand

Winston Smith21 May 2018 12:51 p.m. PST

Armand, the last time you posted this, it was demolished.
Just like his "study" was demolished in the Real World.
It's garbage "research", with an agenda.

DisasterWargamer Supporting Member of TMP21 May 2018 1:01 p.m. PST

link

A 2002 Study by William and Mary Law Journal taking a more factual look at Bellesiles' work…

Tango0121 May 2018 1:13 p.m. PST

Glup!….

Need urgently the "search button"…(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Cacique Caribe21 May 2018 2:24 p.m. PST

@Winston
This one from March?
TMP link

@Tango
Check this out for now:
link

Dan

Winston Smith21 May 2018 2:48 p.m. PST

Yeah. That one. grin

Major Bloodnok22 May 2018 5:07 a.m. PST

The author even contradicts himself at one point, claiming that women didn't own guns, but then showing a women's probate inventory where she owned three or four guns.

During the F&I wars the Province of Massachsetts Bay in New England would give a bounty to anyone who brought his own gun that enlisted into provincial service. After a campaign, such as Louisbourg, you will see petitions fron soldiers widows claiming that her husbands arms were lost on service. The Province would usually respond by having it replaced from Province stores. I could go on, but I won't (cheers of acclaim in the background). The only thing that book is good for, assuming it is the book I think it is, is bog paper

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.