|  Editor in Chief Bill    | 26 Apr 2018 7:42 p.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  On a scale of 1 to 10, how satisfied are you with the current crop of rulesets? Where 10 is totally satisfied, and 1 is totally dissatisfied. | 
    | CamelCase | 26 Apr 2018 8:27 p.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  10….better than 20-30 years ago! Playability has trumped "realism" for the better. | 
    | evilgong | 26 Apr 2018 8:51 p.m. PST | 
  |  | 
    | mad monkey 1 | 26 Apr 2018 8:56 p.m. PST | 
  |  | 
    | Winston Smith | 26 Apr 2018 9:37 p.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  "Current crop?"I'm playing a set of rules that's at least 10 years old.
 Why do I need to try the new stuff?
 | 
    | rmaker | 26 Apr 2018 9:49 p.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  Like Winston, I'm playing with my old rules. | 
    |  Yellow Admiral  | 26 Apr 2018 10:26 p.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  1 To be fair, I haven't tried *everything*. I think that would be a lifetime project – there are now more Napoleonics rulesets than players. - Ix | 
    | langobard | 27 Apr 2018 1:31 a.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  The 'current crop' stipulation is interesting. I play Black Powder for battalion level games and Age of Eagles for brigade games. I guess both of these games are actually starting to get a little long in the tooth (AoE being an offshoot of Fire and Fury) but since both are still available for purchase, I guess that makes them current? Either way, I can't think of anything that I want more from Napoleonic gaming, so going with a 10. | 
    | PzGeneral | 27 Apr 2018 3:56 a.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  I guess that if your satisfied with the rules your playing, regardless of age, the answer would be high, i.e. 8-10.   If you're still looking for that certain something, the answer would be low, i.e. 1-3. For me, it's a 9.  I have Black Powder and Field of Battle. | 
    | redbanner4145 | 27 Apr 2018 4:34 a.m. PST | 
  |  | 
    | Joes Shop  | 27 Apr 2018 5:06 a.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  10. The set of rules I use is also over 10 years old. | 
    | John de Terre Neuve | 27 Apr 2018 6:28 a.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  I have enjoyed several rulesets that have come out in the last 10 years, so I would assign a 9. I am particularly enjoying General d'armee now which I think is 10 out of 10. John | 
    | oldnorthstate | 27 Apr 2018 8:44 a.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  10…playing with the current version of a rules set that has been actively played for at least 20 years. | 
    | Ed Mohrmann | 27 Apr 2018 9:06 a.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  9 for the most part and the rules are 50(Napoleonic)
 years old.
 | 
    | JimSelzer | 27 Apr 2018 11:13 a.m. PST | 
  |  | 
    | 1968billsfan | 27 Apr 2018 12:13 p.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  Where is my clue stick painted in different colours for the bounce through? | 
    | CamelCase | 27 Apr 2018 1:05 p.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  No pre measuring billsfan | 
    | ancientsgamer | 27 Apr 2018 2:58 p.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  9, General D'armee looks really ace. ESR looks interesting. Snappy Nappy, Blucher and DBN for more abstract games. March attack also looks interesting. It would be 10 if 80% of us would settle on one set. Going to try Napoleon at War again. And would like to try Age of Eagles at some point. | 
    | corona66 | 27 Apr 2018 8:07 p.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  General d'Armee is the best Napoleonic rule set I've played in 40 plus years of playing. A great combination of decision-making, luck and good-looking games. | 
    | 14th NJ Vol | 28 Apr 2018 10:53 a.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  Way back in the day I played Frappe. Then went to Empire. Then AoE. Just bought SHAKO 2.  Just looking for something we can actually play that has a resemblance to Napoleonics.  And a game we can actually finish. I guess on the scale of 1-10 I'm a 7. | 
    | DaleWill  | 02 May 2018 9:55 a.m. PST | 
  | 
  
  Probably 8 or 9.  ESR took the promise of 'Legacy of Glory' and made it reality.  Still love some 'Napoleonic Command'.  'March Attack' gives a nice game.  'Blucher' and 'Snappy Nappy' are great for what they are trying to do. But I will always have a soft spot for 'From Valmy to Waterloo', 'Fire & Steel', the old E.E.L. rules.  Just don't have days anymore to play them. |