"Edward III and the Hundred Years War" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench ArticleAdam loves Scorched Brown...
Featured Profile ArticleOur man in Jerusalem reports on the sights of Crusader-era Jerusalem.
|
Tango01 | 05 Apr 2018 9:31 p.m. PST |
"EDWARD III. reigned for fifty years—from 1327 to 1377. During the first four years, the government was in the hands of those who had deposed Edward II.; but when Edward III. was eighteen years old, he took the power into his own hands. He was handsome, brave, and energetic. In the greater part of his reign, the people gladly supported him, for the wars which he carried on were popular, and he let Parliament have much power. But, in his old age, he grew selfish and extravagant, and troubles arose. The most important thing in the reign of Edward III. was the beginning of a long war—or rather a series of wars—with France. We call this the Hundred Years' War, because it lasted for more than a century, from 1327 to 1453…" Main page link Amicalement Armand
|
Vigilant | 06 Apr 2018 4:22 a.m. PST |
If he had died a few years earlier he would have been known as Britain's greatest king and would be much better known in England. As it is the decline in his later years took the edge off his achievements both on and off the battlefield. He was responsible for having legal hearings conducted in English so that the common people could understand what they were being accused of, rather than in Norman French or Latin. He is a character well worth looking at in greater detail. |
Tango01 | 06 Apr 2018 10:55 a.m. PST |
|
uglyfatbloke | 08 Apr 2018 6:29 a.m. PST |
Not a very good article really…no mention of the fact that Edward had effectively accepted defeat in Scotland by 1337 (if not before) – did n't stop him from continuing to campaign there, but with no prospect of conquest. Professor Nicholson's 'Edward III and the Scots' is a good place to start. |
jeeves | 08 Apr 2018 1:25 p.m. PST |
Great king. He slaughtered thousands. |
Tango01 | 08 Apr 2018 3:15 p.m. PST |
|
|