Help support TMP


"Edward III and the Hundred Years War" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

To The Strongest!


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints Some Lady Pirates

Adam loves Scorched Brown...


Featured Profile Article

Crusader Jerusalem

Our man in Jerusalem reports on the sights of Crusader-era Jerusalem.


757 hits since 5 Apr 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0105 Apr 2018 9:31 p.m. PST

"EDWARD III. reigned for fifty years—from 1327 to 1377. During the first four years, the government was in the hands of those who had deposed Edward II.; but when Edward III. was eighteen years old, he took the power into his own hands. He was handsome, brave, and energetic. In the greater part of his reign, the people gladly supported him, for the wars which he carried on were popular, and he let Parliament have much power. But, in his old age, he grew selfish and extravagant, and troubles arose.

The most important thing in the reign of Edward III. was the beginning of a long war—or rather a series of wars—with France. We call this the Hundred Years' War, because it lasted for more than a century, from 1327 to 1453…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Vigilant06 Apr 2018 4:22 a.m. PST

If he had died a few years earlier he would have been known as Britain's greatest king and would be much better known in England. As it is the decline in his later years took the edge off his achievements both on and off the battlefield. He was responsible for having legal hearings conducted in English so that the common people could understand what they were being accused of, rather than in Norman French or Latin. He is a character well worth looking at in greater detail.

Tango0106 Apr 2018 10:55 a.m. PST

Agree!

Amicalement
Armand

uglyfatbloke08 Apr 2018 6:29 a.m. PST

Not a very good article really…no mention of the fact that Edward had effectively accepted defeat in Scotland by 1337 (if not before) – did n't stop him from continuing to campaign there, but with no prospect of conquest. Professor Nicholson's 'Edward III and the Scots' is a good place to start.

jeeves08 Apr 2018 1:25 p.m. PST

Great king. He slaughtered thousands.

Tango0108 Apr 2018 3:15 p.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.