Help support TMP


"Did Shaka Zulu have an all-female regiment?" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

More 15mm Boxers from Cellmate

Tod gives us another look at his "old school" Boxer Rebellion figures.


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


1,684 hits since 15 Mar 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

rhymoraz15 Mar 2018 12:32 p.m. PST

This claim is made in a Hugo award winning article in passing, but I'm unable to trace it down. One writer, Joshua S. Goldstein in his book _War and Gender_ claims


"Shaka Zulu's army by one erroneous account had an all-female front-line regiment. Scholarship on Shaka's military tactics makes clear that all the soldiers were men."

but the footnote goes to a defunct site.

Did he have an all female regiment? Are there miniatures of it? did it fight?

15th Hussar15 Mar 2018 12:46 p.m. PST

NWF is my beat, BUT he had a seraglio of sorts, organized in a military fashion, but what that fashion was, I have no clue.

Females carried small shields and assegai's in their ceremonial dances, but I've certainly never heard of a Female Zulu regiment on the field of battle.

Others will chime in, I'm sure.

14Bore15 Mar 2018 1:54 p.m. PST

I think so but don't quote me on it.

Winston Smith15 Mar 2018 2:11 p.m. PST

I believe that the women were organized by year class, as were the men.
The men were organized into fighting regiments, while the women were reserved as "wives" for the men, once they were permitted to marry.

I think. grin

Gone Fishing15 Mar 2018 2:22 p.m. PST

I believe Andrew and Winston are correct. While the women were regimented by age and marriageability, all fighting was done by men. The only African culture I can think of off the top of my head that had female warriors is that of Dahomey – and I've read that even in that instance their use has been exaggerated.

Ed Mohrmann Supporting Member of TMP15 Mar 2018 2:28 p.m. PST

Goldstein may have been attributing the all-female
'Amazon' unit of Dahomey to Shaka Zulu.

There were supposedly over 1,000 (and perhaps as many
as 5,000) female warriors in the Dahomey army of the
mid-19th C.

Early in the period, they were armed with ML flintlock
firearms and later with Winchesters, according to
a couple of sources.

Fighting in battle against the French, the 'Amazons' did
not do well, but not for lack of trying.

The Smithsonian website has an article:

link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.