"Battle of Bannockburn" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Command figures for the 1410 Teutonics.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article The Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
| Tango01 | 27 Dec 2017 12:44 p.m. PST |
"…There is great controversy over every aspect of the Battle of Bannockburn due to the lack of contemporary accounts. The eminent Scottish historian William Mackenzie came to the conclusion that the English army comprised around 3,000 mounted men, knights and men-at-arms, and around 13,000 foot soldiers, including a detachment of Welsh archers. William Mackenzie put the Scots at around 7,000 men. Robert de Bruce's army comprised foot soldiers with a force of around 600 light horsemen commanded by Sir Robert Keith, the Marischal…."
Main page
link
Who wargame this battle?
Amicalement
Armand |
| uglyfatbloke | 22 Mar 2018 10:48 a.m. PST |
Me. The linked article is seriously poor in any way you like. |
|
receives a gift from his wife…
