"Rus vs Nikephorian Byzantine" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Battle Reports Message Board Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
| PHGamer | 27 Oct 2017 6:38 p.m. PST |
Rus vs Nikephorian Byzantine
The Byzantines are bent on expansion and strike north into the heartlands of the Rus. Game System: L'Art de la Guerre, about 200 points per side. link
Enjoy
|
| PHGamer | 01 Nov 2017 5:41 a.m. PST |
I have a question for the group. I have a number of these battle reports posted here, and one of the reasons I do this is to study why some articles get clicked on, while other do not. In this case, I have the linked article above, of a battle report titled simply "Rus vs Nikephorian Byzantine". At the same point I posted another, "Hundred Years War English vs. Timurid Persians." The differences between the number of clicks is about 30%. This is a marked difference. I would take it as a favor if any of you can explain why you clicked on this article, but not the other. By my google stats this is about 200 of you. Thanks,
Phil |
| PHGamer | 01 Nov 2017 5:42 a.m. PST |
I have a question for the group. I have a number of these battle reports posted here, and one of the reasons I do this is to study why some articles get clicked on, while other do not. In this case, I have the linked article above, of a battle report titled simply "Hundred Years War English vs. Timurid Persians." At the same point I posted another, "Rus vs Nikephorian Byzantine". The differences between the number of clicks is about 30%. This is a marked difference. I would take it as a favor if any of you can explain why you clicked on this article, but not the other. By my google stats this is about 200 of you. Thanks,
Phil |
| Ten Fingered Jack | 19 Jan 2018 2:34 a.m. PST |
Ahistorical match ups. Aztecs vs Tibetans…c'mon! |
| Caliban | 19 Jan 2018 3:01 p.m. PST |
I personally prefer historical matches too. |
| Maxshadow | 21 Jan 2018 12:32 a.m. PST |
I find historical particularly classical or bibical more attractive. |
| Elenderil | 22 Jan 2018 11:13 a.m. PST |
In no particular order
- Historical Period interest me
- Historical match ups
- Larger Battles
- Historical refights
- Using a set of rules I am interested in
- Explanations of rule mechanisms
- Interesting writing style Or there was nothing else to read that day!😀 |
| khanscom | 30 Jan 2018 4:14 p.m. PST |
I enjoy playing Traditional Russian/ Muscovite armies in the ancient/ renaissance period-- the "Rus" in the title caught my attention. |
|
