"Roman Auxiliaries Ranks" Topic
1 Post
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Product Reviews Message Board Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board Back to the Plastic Figures Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral Ancients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleOne way to avoid the 'pitcher's mound' effect.
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
|
Tango01 | 26 Oct 2017 12:26 p.m. PST |
"When any empire is established, the occupying rulers always try to get the new subject peoples to provide at least some of the armed force necessary to maintain or expand that empire. Such troops tend to be a lot cheaper and, let's be honest, are seen as more expendable than the high quality forces of the occupiers. The Roman Empire was no different, and sustained itself not merely with the small number of legions available, but with large numbers of auxiliaries, some with native costume and weaponry, and some kitted in a manner more like the legions themselves. Exactly how such troops looked remains debatable to this day, but a ‘classic' look has long been accepted as fairly typical if not universal, and this set from Strelets follows that style with a collection of standing figures…."
Full review here link Amicalement Armand
|
|