Help support TMP


"Meet the Koksan, North Korea’s Giant Artillery" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2008-present) Message Board



623 hits since 24 Oct 2017
©1994-2018 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP24 Oct 2017 10:03 p.m. PST

"Seoul has to cope with an unusual urban planning program for a huge, modern metropolis: the northern side of the capital lies little more than 30 miles from the border of North Korea, within range of hundreds of enemy artillery pieces — a zone that Pyongyang has threatened to turn into a "sea of fire." City planners have gamely built more than 23 square kilometers of bomb shelters in the South Korean capital as a precaution.

While the growing threat posed by Pyongyang's ballistic missiles, potentially with nuclear armament, is of greater concern, the effects of a sustained deluge of high explosive or chemical shells on a city with a population of 10 million — greater than New York City — is still hair-raising to consider…."

picture

Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

pzivh43 Supporting Member of TMP25 Oct 2017 3:21 a.m. PST

An impressive artillery piece, but it's material condition looks rather poor. Not much of a threat, IMO.

PMC31725 Oct 2017 3:59 a.m. PST

pzivh43 – the one in the image is an Iraqi version, captured from the Iranians, and currently sitting knackered in a tank/vehicle park somewhere around Baghdad.

The DPRK's ones will be in much better nick.

Great War Ace Inactive Member25 Oct 2017 6:20 a.m. PST

That's a baby gun. In spite of the double entendre it is puny compared to a rail gun, for instance, or real artillery sitting entirely out of range.

Dentatus Fezian25 Oct 2017 6:24 a.m. PST

Between the rust and the lack of tracks, I don't think it's much of a concern.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP25 Oct 2017 10:48 a.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

jdginaz25 Oct 2017 1:39 p.m. PST

"The DPRK's ones will be in much better nick."

Better but not likely much better.

Lion in the Stars25 Oct 2017 4:54 p.m. PST

Oh, the 170mm guns.

Might be usable, but might not be very effective. The US 175mm guns were particularly inaccurate due to barrel whip.

But yeah, 500 of those.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.