Help support TMP


"Eating Prisoners of War? Ten Thousand Years of ... " Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Historical Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Quickie Figs


Rating: gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The QuarterMaster Table Top

Need 16 square feet of gaming space, built to order?


Featured Workbench Article

One 3D Model, Many Bases?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian wonders why create different 3D models, if you can create one that can be customized?


Featured Profile Article

Mini Wooden Palettes

Building blocks?


Current Poll


758 hits since 9 Aug 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0109 Aug 2017 9:42 p.m. PST

…"I Surrender'

"A.G. writes ‘I have often wondered what happened to the wounded left behind during the Napoleonic wars and earlier. Did the locals come along and kill them for their personal belongings, were they cared for and held for ransom, what? I am speaking here of the common soldiers and not their leaders.' Beach should start by saying that, while no expert, he senses a rich and interesting study here: has anyone tried to reduce this to a book length work: drbeachcombing AT yahoo DOT com

First, let's establish a range of possibilities if you catch an enemy combatant. To Beach's mind there are essentially five. (i) You can kill him. (ii) You can keep him as a slave. (iii) You can ransom him. (iv) You can keep him captive until the end of hostilities. (v) You can let him go. Of course, there will be lots of in between categories. (You can avoid killing your prisoner until he is fattened, then you can publicly eat him with the elders of the tribe… some Meso-American cultures.) But these five surely cover the range of possibilities?

So how do these break down historically speaking? Beach suspects the key fact in early human history is that hunter gatherer societies – with their endearing head hunting ways – have little use for slaves: unless we are talking of the let's-fatten-them-up-before-we eat-them-kind. This corresponds to certain archaeological digs that have happened on early battle scenes where no quarter was given: even to enemy civilians (in as much as that concept existed before there was a civis…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Cacique Caribe09 Aug 2017 10:32 p.m. PST

Well, if people are what they eat, the French must be in some demand. :)

Dan

Personal logo piper909 Supporting Member of TMP10 Aug 2017 9:53 a.m. PST

EEw! Still, this would lend some zest to prisoner taking in my minis games. Perhaps I should begin mandating that ALL captives be placed in a large stew pot to the rear of the battle line. At the end of the day, the winners eat the losers.

Tango0110 Aug 2017 11:06 a.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Henry Martini10 Aug 2017 5:09 p.m. PST

This was common practice amongst the tribal allies of the Belgians in the Congo.

Cacique Caribe12 Aug 2017 12:36 p.m. PST

I think one of the kings of Mali had the habit of eating captives on the return trips after his seasonal raids. I can't recall his name, but neighboring tribes were absolutely terrified of him.

Dan

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.