Help support TMP


"Marco Polo did not go to China," Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Lord of the Sea


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Oddzial Osmy's 15mm Teutonic Spearmen

PhilGreg Painters in Sri Lanka paints our Teutonic spearmen.


Featured Book Review


1,031 hits since 26 Jul 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0126 Jul 2017 9:52 p.m. PST

"As an Asianist, teaching world history can be very frustrating. Most world history textbooks are written by Western historians, mostly the same Europeanists who write the Western Civ texts, but they usually add an Asianist to the group, usually a China or India person. Sometimes they get it right, but a lot of the time you can tell that the Asia chapters were written by someone who picked up one or two basic textbooks. You can sometimes even tell which textbook (I love Mikiso Hane's work, but it has to be read in context!), and they're often out-of-date (Asia textbooks don't get the kind of semi-annual polishing now current in the trade, and there are some really creaky old classics still being used by thousands of people; that's a subject for another post).

So I spend a fair bit of time in class correcting and contextualizing the textbook material. Maybe the experience is the same for Europeanists, or Americanists? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that material is much better served by the distillation process than the Asian material.

The worst, the most consistently annoying thing, though, is Marco Polo. Let me say this clearly and plainly: Marco Polo did not go to China, Marco Polo did not work for the Mongol Yuan Dynasty. Yes, it was possible to make the journey, and yes, some non-Chinese did serve the Yuan. But the errors in his Travels cannot be glossed over as"a traveler's tendency to exaggerate (especially in regard to numbers)" and his absence from Yuan records (which were pretty well kept) cannot be slipped by with"may have been employed" and the distinct likelihood that Polo was simply embellishing translations of Chinese gazetteers he picked up in Persia is not clearly expressed by"Scholars have long regarded Marco Polo's book, if used carefully, as an important historical document."…."
Main page
historynewsnetwork.org/blog/6746


Amicalement
Armand

Sobieski27 Jul 2017 5:20 a.m. PST

Ho hum. Another stop press.

rmaker27 Jul 2017 9:54 a.m. PST

Tango, you posted this earlier. And, as was noted at that time, this guy is just parroting the official PRC version.

Tango0127 Jul 2017 10:28 a.m. PST

Yes…?… I don't remember it… sorry for that…


Amicalement
Amrand

Cacique Caribe27 Jul 2017 12:00 p.m. PST

LOL. This might be at least the third time you posted this.

Here are the other two I found:

TMP link
TMP link

Dan

Tango0127 Jul 2017 10:30 p.m. PST

That point me as a fan of Marco Polo?… (smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Cacique Caribe29 Jul 2017 7:31 a.m. PST

Of Marco or his critics? :)

Dan

Tango0129 Jul 2017 10:47 a.m. PST

Both!!… (smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.