"Rules revisions - New Editions" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Game Design Message Board
Action Log
01 Feb 2018 5:16 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
- Crossposted to Game Design board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Rating: 
Featured Book Review
|
DisasterWargamer  | 02 Jul 2017 1:40 p.m. PST |
Curious what peoples experience with new Editions of rule sets Fire and Fury Original to now Fire and Fury 2nd is just the latest in updated rules. For me I will likely continue to play the original with a few of the suggested tweaks – for me the new edition took too large a step towards the Regimental version – while it will make it easier to shift between figure rations, by adding in many of the pieces of the regimental rules it lost a bit of its unique identity. Note I am a huge Fire and Fury fan – playing both the Original and the Regimental versions. A couple of questions Which rules sets have you welcomed updated versions? Which rule sets do you still play the original? For me – Battles for Empire I welcomed I did not welcome the new versions of Fire and Fury, Empire (though their first upgrade was needed – by the time they got to the 5th edition I was done), and DBR. |
| ZULUPAUL | 02 Jul 2017 2:14 p.m. PST |
I play DBA 2.2 no interest in the new edition.
Enjoyed getting TSATF 25th edition. |
| DisasterWargamer | 02 Jul 2017 2:34 p.m. PST |
|
 miniMo | 03 Jul 2017 7:13 a.m. PST |
Welcomed:
* BattleTech Alpha Strike
Still Playing:
* DBA 2.2
* D&D original |
|
