Help support TMP


"Mounted Infantry - did they melee on horseback?" Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Volley & Bayonet


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds artillery to his soft-plastic Union forces.


1,229 hits since 30 Jun 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
14th NJ Vol30 Jun 2017 5:56 a.m. PST

Did mounted infantry fight ( charge ) while in the
Saddle? If yes what were they armed with? I have a scenario
That has both sides with rifle musket armed cavalry. I know
In the game folks will want to charge while mounted.

Andy

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP30 Jun 2017 6:54 a.m. PST

Not that I ever heard. Ride to the fight then dismount. They were not trained to fight on horseback.

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP30 Jun 2017 7:02 a.m. PST

Mounted infantry were exactly that – as noted, mediocre horsemen who rode to get somewhere quick, then dismount to fight

For example, one of the reasons the Royal Canadian Dragoons were so effective in South Africa during the Boer War was that they had absolutely no hesitation about quickly dismounting and using their machine gun section

ScottWashburn Sponsoring Member of TMP30 Jun 2017 7:23 a.m. PST

Mounted infantry in the Civil War would have not had sabers or pistols, so fighting from horseback with a rifle (and possibly a bayonet) would have been awkward to say the least. They would have no training for mounted combat, either. Far more likely they would dismount to fight.

rustymusket30 Jun 2017 7:37 a.m. PST

Good. That is what I understood but I was waiting for someone more knowledgeable to answer.

Ed Mohrmann Supporting Member of TMP30 Jun 2017 8:07 a.m. PST

The best example of MI is probably Wilder's 'Lightening'
Brigade (9th/92nd/98th/123 Illinois Infantry).

Wilder mounted his men on captured or seized animals,
provided them with long-handled axes as a melee weapon
although I could find NO accounts where the units were
actually involved in melee combat) and Spencer repeaters.

The MI were that for mobility, not shock.

Great War Ace30 Jun 2017 8:27 a.m. PST

You fight from the back of a horse when you want to court Death. Trained cavalry would make instant mincemeat out of mounted infantry, who would only fight mounted if forced to by ambush or trying to get away……..

14th NJ Vol30 Jun 2017 8:51 a.m. PST

Thanks folks. I'll set up all the mounted infantry as
A no go for mounted melee.

Andy

Waco Joe30 Jun 2017 9:41 a.m. PST

yeah, not if they could help it.

Personal logo Jeff Ewing Supporting Member of TMP30 Jun 2017 1:34 p.m. PST

Still…a melee with "long-handled axes" would look great on the table.

Extrabio1947 Supporting Member of TMP30 Jun 2017 4:59 p.m. PST

Whoever saw a dead cavalryman?

IMHO, Wilder's Lightning Brigade was the most effective unit in the war. Tough fighters, mounted, and armed with Spencer's they purchased themselves. And don't forget Eli Lilly's attached artillery battery.

GreyONE30 Jun 2017 5:58 p.m. PST

The only mounted infantry I read about who were issued with swords were the Australian Light Horse, but that was the 1908 pattern cavalry troopers sword were issued to all ranks of the Australian Mounted Division (3rd, 4th and 5th Light Horse Brigades) in August 1918.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.