Help support TMP


"Ancients: Single Model vs Element" Topic


26 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Action Log

22 Dec 2017 11:54 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: The Phalangitrixes

Beowulf Fezian paints the prototypes for the Eureka Amazon Army.


Featured Workbench Article

Cheetahs

Wyatt the Odd Fezian paints some fast cats.


Featured Profile Article


Current Poll


1,884 hits since 27 May 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian27 May 2017 3:36 p.m. PST

JJartist once wrote – TMP link -

WAB's current disfavor is that it is a single model style game – in a world where elements are all the rage.

Do you prefer single-model or element-based games?

Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut27 May 2017 3:40 p.m. PST

It depends on the game… I would hate to do Platea or Changping with individual figures, but I would hate doing a skirmish or boarding action with elements.

Cacique Caribe27 May 2017 4:07 p.m. PST

I don't know about you guys, but I'm starting to REALLY like this troop block idea I just came across:

picture

picture

picture

TMP link

TMP link

Someone should do those for ALL big battles … with Fantasy, and Medievals, and Ancients, and you name it!

Dan

Khusrau27 May 2017 4:14 p.m. PST

Elements. Any Ancients game purporting to do Gaugamela or Daras with single figures is a nonsense.

Cacique Caribe27 May 2017 4:26 p.m. PST

Khusrau,

I always imagine all those battles exactly like this:

picture

Dan

Sobieski27 May 2017 5:39 p.m. PST

It was a major liberation to realise that I didn't need to use single elements for anything but commanders and scouts, and not even always for those.

Personal logo Bobgnar Supporting Member of TMP27 May 2017 9:29 p.m. PST

I like DBV for single figure game, and DBA 3 for game with elements.

TKindred Supporting Member of TMP27 May 2017 9:34 p.m. PST

I like both. I have a couple armies I kept in single bases for playing WAB, as I am still quite fond of the game.

However, most everything else is based for Impetus on 120,,X60mm (or deeper) unit bases.

In case I need those WAB minis for Impetus (or other) games, I also have movement trays ready to hand. Easy solution for me, anyway. I realize that YMMV.

V/R

Phillius Sponsoring Member of TMP27 May 2017 10:05 p.m. PST

I'm with TKindred.

Most of my playing is DBMM so just about everything is on 60mm frontage.

However, new stuff is being based in singles or groups of singles.

RelliK27 May 2017 11:08 p.m. PST

15mm for elements and 28mm for singles.

The Last Conformist27 May 2017 11:44 p.m. PST

15mm elements for battles, 28mm singles for skirmish.

langobard28 May 2017 3:13 a.m. PST

Another vote for elements.

Ten Fingered Jack28 May 2017 6:06 a.m. PST

Single models with some multiple bases.

MichaelCollinsHimself28 May 2017 6:36 a.m. PST

Cacique Caribe

I have done something very similar in 6mm…

My Napoleonic armies are at:

link

I have made a few roughs for ancients too – they may appear sometime in the future perhaps?

MichaelCollinsHimself28 May 2017 6:37 a.m. PST

Yes, simple; element based is best for games of a larger scale!

advocate28 May 2017 6:52 a.m. PST

For battles, elements.

williamb28 May 2017 8:53 a.m. PST

elements for battles, singles for skirmish.

mckrok Supporting Member of TMP28 May 2017 9:37 a.m. PST

I have a strong preference for games with a lot of figures, so I've primarily beem building units of elements with a few single stands to 'make change' if necessary. Over time, I've been rehabilitating old units of single figures as above.
pjm

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP28 May 2017 10:50 a.m. PST

I go both ways--elements for small figures and individual mounts for 28mm. But I want elements that look like something--16 formed 5mm infantry on a 40mm stand or 16 15mm pikes in an 60mmX60mm block. None of this "four castings is a decent chunk of an army" busines.

GarrisonMiniatures28 May 2017 11:08 a.m. PST

Elements – usually play solo using DBX variations, makes life a lot easier. Obviously skirmish type games need individual bases.

Bill Rosser Supporting Member of TMP28 May 2017 5:21 p.m. PST

Elements for land games, individual ships for naval

Decebalus29 May 2017 4:16 a.m. PST

Because skirmish is boring, elements.

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP29 May 2017 4:37 a.m. PST

Single figure basing.

For larger battles, a single based figure does not equal one man. I assume that is the same for the number of figures on an element base. Generally each figure will count for the lowest level unit that can receive a command.

Sometimes multiple figures will count for a unit, usually if there is a need to track state by removing figures from the unit. So units will only have 4-8 figures.

TodCreasey29 May 2017 5:02 a.m. PST

Problem is I like skirmish (Saga and Frostgrave) and big battles so I have no choice but single basing.

I love the look of diorama bases and that is actually usually my choice when I have enough single based elements that I can start multi basing. The problem is configurations change battle to battle so usually a diorama base limits what you can do.

Ten Fingered Jack31 May 2017 1:07 a.m. PST

I forgot! single basing AND buckets 'o dice.

JJartist05 Jun 2017 9:16 p.m. PST

I prefer single basing, but it gets harder.
Sabots are my current favorite. 60mm x 40mm allow enough combinations and magnets are cheap.

WAB is essentially an element game, made more difficult by allowing a lot of free form units.. but usually the units are guided by the unseen hand into similar sized arrangements on multi-model unit trays.

Some will always point out that there are other keen ways to denote single model casualties… markers casualty figure bases… and I say more power to that. As long as people can see what is going on .. then I like the game.

To me visual representation is the whole point of a miniature game. So if a four ranked 6x4 phalanx unit looks like a skirmish unit to some, I prefer the massed figures.

I prefer attrition to base elimination, and larger figures that I can still see, so that is what puts me off a lot of the element games that often gain an audience more with the 15mm afficionados.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.